Mayor of Plainsville: In order to help the economy of Plainsville, I am using some of our tax revenues to help bring a major highway through new business to Plainsville.
Citizens’ group: You must have interests other than our economy in mind. If you were really interested in helping our economy, you would instead allocate the revenues to building a new business park, the business that your highway would.
What this question is testing
Setup
The mayor wants to spend tax revenue on a highway to bring in business. The citizens' group says:
Evaluate
The whole accusation rests on the mayor knowing — or at least agreeing — that the business park would bring in more business. If the mayor genuinely thinks the highway is the better economic choice, then picking the highway is not evidence of ulterior motives; it is just evidence of disagreement about which option works better economically.
Imagine you tell a friend, That is only a fair accusation if your friend agrees salad is better for weight loss. If your friend genuinely thinks pizza is the diet move, you cannot accuse them of secretly not caring about weight loss — they just disagree with you.
Goal
Find the assumption that the mayor accepts the citizens' claim about which option works better.
Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.