Logical Reasoning

PT4 · S4 · Q3 Scientific research that involves international

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

  • Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Start practicing free

Scientific research that involves international collaboration has produced papers of greater influence, as measured by the number of times a paper is cited in subsequent papers, than has research without any collaboration.

Conclusion

The argument concludes that research projects conducted by international research teams are of greater importance than those conducted by single researchers.

Evidence

Papers resulting from international collaboration are cited an average of seven times, whereas papers with single authors are cited only three times on average. This suggests that internationally collaborative research is more influential.

Evaluate

The argument hinges on the premise that the number of citations a paper receives is an indicator of its importance. The author is using citation count as the sole determinant of a paper's value or significance in the scientific community. However, this reasoning requires us to accept that more citations equate to greater importance without considering other possible factors or metrics of importance.

We could challenge this argument by suggesting that citation count might reflect something other than pure importance, such as visibility, accessibility, or trends within specific research communities. Citation numbers can be affected by various factors like the field of study, the journal's reputation, and even the promotion of the paper by the authors or their institutions.

Goal

We need an assumption that links citation count directly to the importance of a paper. The correct answer will likely address or ensure this link, ruling out other interpretations of citation count.

3.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

  1. Prolific writers can inflate the

    Out of Scope: Prolific Writers

    Prolific writers can inflate the number of citations they receive by citing themselves in subsequent papers. While self-citations can affect citation counts, the argument does not specifically address the authors' behavior in citing their own work. This choice is more about the mechanics of citation counts rather than whether citation count equates to research importance.

    1% picked this

  2. It is possible to ascertain

    Irrelevant to the Conclusion: Citation Identification

    It is possible to ascertain whether or not a paper is the product of international collaboration by determining the number of citations it has received. The argument does not claim that you can identify collaboration from citation counts; it only argues about the relative importance (influence) based on those counts. So, establishing collaboration through citation count isn't necessary for the argument.

    6% picked this

  3. Correct

    The number of citations a

    Why this is right

    The number of citations a paper receives is a measure of the importance of the research it reports. This assumption is essential for the argument because it directly ties the number of citations to the importance of the research. If we negate this assumption and say that the number of citations does not measure a paper's importance, then the entire argument falls apart. The author would have no basis for claiming that internationally collaborative research is more important based solely on citation counts.

    Skill tested: Necessary Assumption · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

    87% picked this

  4. The collaborative efforts of scientists

    Out of Scope: Domestic Collaboration

    The collaborative efforts of scientists who are citizens of the same country do not produce papers that are as important as papers that are produced by international collaboration. While this might be an interesting comparison, it's not necessary for this argument specifically, which is about single researchers versus international collaboration. The argument does not need to make comparative claims about same-country collaborations.

    6% picked this

  5. International research teams tend to

    Out of Scope: Funding Levels

    International research teams tend to be more generously funded than are single researchers. Although funding might play a role in the ability to conduct research, the argument does not hinge on funding differences but rather on the assumption that citations equate to importance. Thus, funding levels are not directly relevant to the argument's core assumption.

    0% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill
LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free