Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT3 S4 Q7 Explanation

To become an expert on a

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsFlaw

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

To become an expert on a musical instrument, a person must practice. If people practice a musical instrument for three hours each day, they will eventually become experts on that instrument. Therefore, if a person is an expert on practiced for at least three hours each day.

What this question is testing

Flaw

Your task

Describe the reasoning error the argument actually commits.

Common trap

Answers that name a real logical flaw the argument doesn't actually make.

Winning move

Articulate the gap in the reasoning yourself, then match it to the choice that describes that gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
7.

Which one of the following most accurately describes a flaw in the

Answer choices

  1. Trap14% picked this

    The conclusion fails to take into account that people who practice for three hours every day might not yet have reached a degree of

  2. Correct78% picked this

    The conclusion fails to take into account that practicing for less than three hours each day may be enough for

    Why this is right

    Answer B is correct.

    Skill tested: Flaw · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Trap8% picked this

    The conclusion fails to take into account that if a person has not practiced for at least three hours a day, the

  4. Trap0% picked this

    The conclusion fails to take into account that three consecutive hours of daily practice is not recommended

  5. Trap0% picked this

    The conclusion fails to take into account that few people have the spare time necessary to devote three

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free