Although nondairy coffee lighteners made with coconut oil contain 2 grams of saturated fat per tablespoon, or 7 times more than does whole milk, those lighteners usually contain no cholesterol.
Manufacturer's Claim
Their coconut oil-based lighteners usually cause a lower rise in typical consumer’s blood cholesterol levels than whole milk as a lightener.
Evidence
The paragraph establishes that nondairy lighteners made with coconut oil contain more saturated fat per tablespoon (2 grams) than whole milk, which has 2 milligrams of cholesterol. However, one tablespoon of the lightener increases blood cholesterol to a higher level than whole milk does.
Evaluate
This feels more like a Paradox question than Strengthen.
GIVEN THAT a tablespoon of coconut oil lightener causes a consumer's blood cholesterol to rise higher than does one tablespoon of whole milk,
HOW CAN WE DEFEND THE CLAIM THAT these coconut oil-based lighteners typically cause a lower rise in blood cholesterol than whole milk?
Goal
It seems like we'd have to say that consumers use a smaller amount of these lighteners than they'd use of whole milk (or that they do something different when they use these lighteners that would lighten the load on blood cholesterol, like maybe they don't finish as much of their coffee mug before dumping out the rest).