Logical Reasoning

PT21 · S3 · Q23 Electrical engineers have repeatedly

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

  • Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Start practicing free

Electrical engineers have repeatedly demonstrated that the best solid-state amplifiers are indistinguishable from the best vacuum-tube amplifiers with respect to the characteristics commonly measured in evaluating the quality of an amplifier’s musical reproduction.

Conclusion (Therefore)

Music lovers who insist that recorded music sounds better when played with the best vacuum-tube amplifier than when played with the best solid-state amplifier must be imagining the difference in quality that they claim to hear.

Evidence

The best solid-state amplifiers are indistinguishable from the best vacuum-tube amplifiers with respect to the characteristics commonly measured in evaluating the quality of an amplifier's musical reproduction.

Evaluate

Given that ... the best solid and the best vacuum amps are indistinguishable when it comes to the characteristics commonly measured in evaluating an amp's quality,

How could we say that ... music lovers who insist that music sounds better through a top shelf vacuum amp than through a top shelf solid-state amp are not imagining the difference in quality?

This is sort of a He Said / She Said type argument. According to common metrics used to evaluate an amp's quality, there's no difference between the best solid-state and the best vacuum-tube amp.

But according to the ears / minds of certain music lovers, there is a difference.

This argument is arbitrarily deciding that the amp metrics are correct (there is no difference) and the music lovers are wrong. But couldn't it be the other way around? Maybe the music lovers are correctly hearing a difference, and the way we measure amp quality just fails to capture it.

Maybe two contestants have an identical score when it comes to the metrics of how a certain beauty pageant judged them (same score at the talent portion, the ballgown portion, the swimsuit portion, etc.) But does that mean that someone is just imagining things if they think Contestant 1 is more beautiful than Contestant 2?

No. Maybe the measurements of the beauty pageant fail to capture what the human brain assimilates when it judges beauty.

Maybe amp measurements fail to capture what the human ear/brain can sense when it comes to amp quality.

Goal

Look for some way to argue that,

23.

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

  1. Many people cannot tell from

    Strengthens, if anything

    We only care about people who claim they can tell a difference between a recording being played through the best solid-state vs. the best vacuum-tube amp. This answer is about people who can't tell the difference, so it's of no impact to this conversation. This answer is also about "very good" versions of these two different types of amps, but the conclusion is only commenting on the "best" version of these amps. So again, this is of no relevance to this conversation. Finally, the fact that many people can't tell the difference would basically strengthen the author's conclusion that "music lovers who say that one type sounds better than the other are just imagining the difference".

    5% picked this

  2. The range of variation with

    Irrelevant Distinction: range of variation

    This answer is saying that the quality gap between a crappy vacuum-tube amp and the best vacuum-tube amp is wider than the gap between a crappy solid-state amp and the best solid-state amp. But since this conclusion is only speaking to the best version of each type of amp, we don't care at all about lesser-quality versions of these two types of amps.

    23% picked this

  3. Correct

    Some of the characteristics that

    Why this is right

    This allows us to argue that, "even though the best solid and best vacuum amps would measure the same, people who say they prefer the vacuum amp would not be imagining the difference. After all, the measurements don't tell the full story. Some characteristics that are important in determining how music is perceived by the listener can't be measured". To go back to our pageant metaphor from before, this answer would be saying, "Some of the characteristics that are important to one's perception of beauty cannot be measured". This is making the objection that the quantifiable values we come up with to judge something as amorphous and complex as "beauty" or "sound quality" are probably not telling the full story.

    Skill tested: Weaken · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

    61% picked this

  4. Solid-state amplifiers are more compact,

    Irrelevant Distinctions: not about sound

    None of the distinctions introduced here relate to sound quality / perception of sound quality. These distinctions might have been relevant if the argument were saying, "you should buy this type rather than that type". There we would care about things beyond sound quality, because sound quality is just one factor we'd weigh in making the decision about which amp to buy. But this argument is purely about sound quality. We can't say, "these music lovers are correct to say that there's a difference in sound quality; after all, a vacuum-tube amp is bulkier, uses more power, and generates more heat than a solid-state amplifiers." The amp's dimensions / power demands / heat are not saying anything about how the amp sounds.

    2% picked this

  5. Some vacuum-tube amplifiers are clearly

    No Impact

    This argument is only concerned with comparing the best example of a vacuum-tube amp to the best example of a solid-state amp. The evidence is telling us that when you measure "best vs. best", there's no quality difference in terms of the characteristics measured. But obviously if we compared the best vacuum to the worst solid-state, we'd notice a quality difference, so we already know what this answer is telling us, which is that "at least one vacuum-tube amp is clearly superior to at least one solid-state amp."

    10% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill
LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free