In a large residential building, there is a rule that no pets are allowed. A group of pet lovers tried to change that rule but failed. The rule-changing procedure outlined in the building’s regulations states that only if a group of tenants can obtain the signatures of 10 percent of the tenants the pet lovers were voted down on their proposal by the majority of the tenants.
What this question is testing
Your task
Find the assumption the argument requires in order for its conclusion to hold.
Common trap
Answers that would help the argument but aren't strictly required (sufficient, not necessary).
Winning move
Negate each choice — the right one breaks the argument when negated.
Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.