Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT2 S1 P4 Q25 Explanation

War Powers Resolution

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsInferenceLaw

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

The Constitution of the United States does not explicitly define the extent of the President’s authority to involve United States troops in conflicts with other nations in the absence of a declaration of war. Instead, the question of the President’s authority in this matter falls in the hazy area of concurrent power, the War Powers Resolution of 1973, Congress has at last reclaimed a role in such decisions.

Historically, United States Presidents have not waited for the approval of Congress before involving United States troops in conflicts in which a state of war was not declared. One scholar has identified 199 military engagements that occurred without the consent of Congress, ranging from Jefferson’s conflict with the Barbary pirates to Nixon’s and the President would be applied to the involvement of United States troops in foreign conflicts.

The resolution required the President, in the absence of a declaration of war, to consult with Congress “in every possible instance” before introducing forces and to report to Congress within 48 hours after the forces have actually been deployed. Most important, the resolution allows Congress to veto the involvement once it begins, decisions to use armed force is in accord with the intent and spirit of the Constitution.

What this question is testing

Inference

Your task

Find what must be true based on what the passage or stimulus states.

Common trap

Answers that are plausible or likely but not actually guaranteed by the text.

Winning move

Keep only the choice the statements fully support — eliminate anything that requires an extra assumption.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
25.

It can be inferred from the passage that the War Powers Resolution of 1973 is applicable only in “the absence of a declaration of

Answer choices

  1. Trap5% picked this

    Congress has enacted other laws that already set out presidential requirements for situations in which

  2. Correct63% picked this

    by virtue of declaring war, Congress already implicitly participates in the decision

    Why this is right

    Answer B is correct.

    Skill tested: Inference · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Trap1% picked this

    the President generally receives broad public support during wars that have been formally

  4. Trap3% picked this

    Congress felt that the President should be allowed unlimited discretion in cases in which war

  5. Trap29% picked this

    the United States Constitution already explicitly defines the reporting and consulting requirements of the President in cases in

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free