Reading Comprehension

PT2 · S1 · P1 · Q4 Langston Hughes' Folk Poetry

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

There is substantial evidence that by 1926, with the publication of The Weary Blues, Langston Hughes had broken with two well-established traditions in African American literature.

Topic

Langston Hughes's revolutionary impact on African American literature with his 1926 collection The Weary Blues.

Framework

Old / New

Main Point

Langston Hughes broke with older African American literary traditions that required adopting European styles and promoting racial integration, instead embracing and showcasing authentic Black folk culture in his poetry, which expanded the boundaries of African American literature. The Most Valuable Sentence appears at the opening of the second paragraph:

P1: The Old Tradition—Europeanizing Black Art

The first paragraph introduces the long-standing expectation that African American writers should focus on promoting racial acceptance by conforming to Western European literary techniques. Folk culture and secular songs created by Black people were excluded or reshaped to fit European ideals, as seen in how even spirituals were altered for formal performances.

P2: Hughes’s New Approach—Championing Folk Culture

The second paragraph explains how Hughes intentionally rebelled against these old constraints by showcasing Black oral folk traditions—full of street-talk, humor, and distinctive rhythms—in his poetry. While Hughes presented his poetry as spontaneous, analysis shows it was skillfully crafted. His work set a new standard, expanding what African American literature could express, both thematically and linguistically.

4.

The author most probably mentions the reactions of northern White writers to non-Europeanized “sorrow songs” in order to

  1. indicate that modes of expression

    Too Strong: only

    The passage doesn't provide any support for the extreme claim that "only a small number of White writers in the north found slavery-related modes of expression acceptable". Trap answers love to bait us into illicitly thinking, "Since they only mentioned northern White writers liking these slavery songs, I guess we can say that only northern White writers liked these slavery songs".

    4% picked this

  2. Correct

    contrast White writers’ earlier appreciation

    Why this is right

    This answer is correct because it doesn't say anything wrong. However, for some of us, it's still not really clear why the author wants to make any contrast between White writers' earlier appreciation of the songs and the eventual process of forcing the songs to be Europeanized. Including this detail about the White writers positive reaction to the un-Europeanized sorrow songs seems to mainly make the reader think, "Darn -- society didn't need to Europeanize those slave songs. White people would have liked them anyway, just like these writers did." That helps put the reader in the same indignant mindset as the author, for that final sentence of the paragraph, which is meant to be read in sneering sarcasm.

    Skill tested: Local Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    75% picked this

  3. show that the requirement that

    Too Strong: required / unrelated

    This answer is pretty tempting, because you could potentially read this paragraph to be saying that African Americans devised their own literary tradition and it had two rules: 1. must promote racial acceptance 2. in order to promote racial acceptance, any sorrow song or slave spiritual is required to be Europeanized So when the author presents the northern White writers who have no problem enjoying the earlier, pre-Europeanized sorrow songs sung by slaves, it suggests that "the sorrow songs didn't need to be Europeanized. White people would have liked them anyway." But according to this answer, the author is saying, "The idea, within the African American literature tradition, that Black art would only serve its goal of promoting racial acceptance and integration by being Europeanized was something that came entirely from within the African American hive-mind and had nothing to do with the literary standards or attitudes of White writers". That's just offends common sense too much to be the actual point that this writer was trying to make. In the decades following the Civil War, when Black Americans went from being slaves to "equal citizens", they were still at huge power disadvantages and had to be incredibly accommodating to White people. Thus, the pressure to Europeanize black art in order to help it serve the function of promoting "acceptance and integration" surely was related to White culture.

    17% picked this

  4. demonstrate that such songs in

    Out of Scope: imaginative

    The concept of how imaginative any of these songs were is completely out of scope, so we couldn't compare any two groups of songs in that way.

    2% picked this

  5. suggest that White writers benefited

    Wrong Purpose / Detail-Bait

    This is the classic trap answer on Local Purpose that tries to use wording from the question stem itself. The author was never suggesting that these White writers benefited from hearing the sorrow songs, just that they responded favorably.

    1% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free