Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT18 S4 Q19 Explanation

People who receive unsolicited advice

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsPrinciple-Conform

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

People who receive unsolicited advice from someone whose advantage would be served if that advice is taken should regard the proffered advice with skepticism unless there is good reason to think that their interests advice giver in the circumstance in question.

What this question is testing

Principle-Conform

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
19.

This principle, if accepted, would justify which one of the

Answer choices

  1. Bad Conclusion Match8% picked this

    After learning by chance that Harriet is looking for a secure investment for her retirement savings, Floyd writes to her recommending the R&M Company

    The quickest way to skip past this is to glance first for the Conclusion, indirectly indicated here by a Premise marker: Since _____ , [conclusion] The conclusion here is "reject his advice out of hand". Total dismissal. The principle has to support a conclusion that means something like "should be skeptical". That's not the meaning of "reject out of hand". Skeptical implies that you're still undecided.

  2. Correct49% picked this

    While shopping for a refrigerator, Ramon is approached by a salesperson who, on the basis of her personal experience, warns him against the least

    Why this is right

    Unsolicited advice? Yes, the salesperson approached Ramon. Advice would serve the giver's interests? Yes, the salesperson makes more in commission when she sells something that costs more money, and she's recommending that Ramon buy a more expensive model. No good reason to think interests coincide? Nothing mentioned. The advice was on the basis of her experience. Is the conclusion telling Ramon to be skeptical of the advice? Yes, it says "don't reject the least expensive on her advice alone". i.e., "remain undecided for now".

    Skill tested: Principle-Conform · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Solicited Advice9% picked this

    Mario wants to bring pastry to Yvette’s party, and when he consults her Yvette suggests that he bring his favorite chocolate fudge brownies from

    Since Mario consults Yvette about what advice she has for a pastry to bring to her party, he is soliciting her advice, so this principle doesn't apply. We can bail once we see "he consults her".

  4. Interests Coincide19% picked this

    Sara overhears Ron talking about a course he will be teaching and interrupts to recommend a textbook for his course. However, even though Sara

    Unsolicited advice? Yes, she interrupts. Advice would serve the giver's interests? Yes, her friend is the editor of the book and she wrote a chapter. No good reason to think interests coincide? Actually, it's murky. He wrote a chapter in the book too, so this is why this answer loses out to (B).

  5. Opposite Conclusion16% picked this

    Mei is buying fish for soup. Joel, who owns the fish market where Mei is a regular and valued customer, suggests a much less

    The conclusion (indirectly indicated by Premise word "Since") is saying should accept recommendation. Our principle only can prove should be skeptical about recommendation. You can't take a rule like if you lie to your mom, you did something bad And flip it, to get if didn't lie to mom, you did nothing bad

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free