Luminist Paintings

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsPrimary PurposeHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one
Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step
81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Free to start

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

In the history of nineteenth-century landscape painting in the United States, the Luminists are distinguished by their focus on atmosphere and light. The accepted view of Luminist paintings is that they are basically spiritual and imply a tranquil mysticism that contrasts with earlier American artists’ concept of nature as dynamic and energetic. the onlooker toward a lucid transcendentalism, an idealized vision of the world.

What this view fails to do is to identify the true significance of this transcendental atmosphere in Luminist paintings. The prosaic factors that are revealed by a closer examination of these works suggest that the glowing appearance of nature in Luminism is actually a sign of nature’s domestication, its adaptation to human a muting of those emotions, like awe and fear, which untamed nature elicits.

One critic, in describing the spiritual quality of harbor scenes by Fitz Hugh Lane, an important Luminist, carefully notes that “at the peak of Luminist development in the 1850s and 1860s, spiritualism in America was extremely widespread.” It is also true, however, that the 1850s and 1860s were a time of trade In all of these places he painted the harbors with their ships—the instruments of expanding trade.

Lane usually depicts places like New York Harbor, with ships at anchor, but even when he depicts more remote, less commercially active harbors, nature appears pastoral and domesticated rather than primitive or unexplored. The ships, rather than the surrounding landscapes—including the sea—are generally the active element in his pictures. For Lane the justification of the atmosphere necessary for business, if also an exaggerated, idealistic rendering of that atmosphere.

What this question is testing

Primary Purpose

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question

27.

The author’s primary purpose is

Answer choices

Accepted vs. New2% picked this
refute a new
The passage is trying to challenge the accepted theory of Luminist paintings are all about. So we would say the passage wants to refute an old/accepted theory. The author seems to be putting forth a new theory.
2%
Correct72% picked this
replace an inadequate
Why this is right
This sounds very similar to the "clarify a misconception" we were looking for. The accepted view, for the author, is an inadequate analysis. After all, (beginning of P2), "what this view fails to do is to identify the true significance of the atmosphere in Luminist paintings". Since the accepted view fails to identify the true significance, it's fair to call it "an inadequate analysis". And because our author tells us what we should think instead, it's fair to say she wants to replace this view with a new one.
Skill tested: Primary Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.
72%
Too Neutral3% picked this
summarize current critics’
"Summarize" is not an attractive verb for a Challenge Position passage. It suggests that the author just wanted to report on what critics have said, without offering any of her own opinions. The author summarizes critics' attitudes in the first paragraph, and then spends the rest of the passage explaining why those attitudes are off the mark.
3%
Opposite13% picked this
support another critic’s
The author is here to counter critics' evaluations, not to support them. She disagrees with the accepted view. And later she brings up a critic in the 3rd paragraph and also disagrees with that critic (that critic is really just representing the accepted view).
13%
Out of Scope: describe history10% picked this
describe the history of a
The purpose of the passage is to identify or call out a misinterpretation. There isn't a chronological retelling of how this misinterpretation first came to pass or how it's evolved. The passage begins with the accepted misinterpretation and spends the remaining paragraphs disputing that misinterpretation.
10%

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free