Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT18 S3 P3 Q21 Explanation

Changing Cherokee

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsInferenceSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Until recently, it was thought that the Cherokee, a Native American tribe, were compelled to assimilate Euro-American culture during the 1820s. During that decade, it was supposed, White missionaries arrived and, together with their part Cherokee intermediaries, imposed the benefits of “civilization” on Cherokee tribes while the United States government actively promoted economic and political autonomy would automatically mean the end of its cultural autonomy as well.

William G. McLoughlin has recently argued that not only did Cherokee culture flourish during and after the 1820s, but the Cherokee themselves actively and continually reshaped their culture. Missionaries did have a decisive impact during these years, he argues, but that impact was far from what it was intended to be. The did not, according to McLoughlin, undermine the elitist reforms, but supplemented them with popular, traditionalist counterparts.

Traditionalist Cherokee did not reject the elitist reforms outright, McLoughlin argues, simply because they recognized that there was more than one way to use the skills the missionaries could provide them. As he quotes one group as saying, “We want our children to learn English so that the White man cannot cheat resulted were distinctively Cherokee, yet reflected the larger political and social setting in which they flourished.

Because his work concentrates on the nineteenth century, McLoughlin unfortunately overlooks earlier sources of influence, such as eighteenth-century White resident traders and neighbors, thus obscuring the relative impact of the missionaries of the 1820s in contributing to both acculturalization and resistance to it among the Cherokee. However, McLoughlin is undoubtedly correct in of how Cherokee culture changed while retaining its essential identity after confronting the missionaries.

What this question is testing

Inference

Your task

Find what must be true based on what the passage or stimulus states.

Common trap

Answers that are plausible or likely but not actually guaranteed by the text.

Winning move

Keep only the choice the statements fully support — eliminate anything that requires an extra assumption.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
21.

It can be inferred from the author’s discussion of McLoughlin’s views that the author thinks that Cherokee acculturalization

Answer choices

  1. Out of Scope: reversed1% picked this

    was reversed in the decades following

    Nothing in the 2nd or 3rd paragraph talks about the Cherokee reversing the process (is that even possible?) and un-assimilating. They are instead building a picture in which assimilating into majority culture and preservation of tribal culture existed side by side.

  2. Correct69% picked this

    may have been part of an already-existing process

    Why this is right

    This is conveying the idea that "acculturalization was not forced on the Cherokee; rather, the Cherokee themselves actively and continually reshaped their culture". It's not like acculturalization began when the White missionaries arrived in the 1820s. Since the Cherokee are continually re-shaping their culture, we know that this predates the Missionaries arriving. And since the missionaries mainly catered to "the interests of an acculturating part-Cherokee elite", we can tell that these Cherokee elite were already acculturating. We couldn't say, "The missionaries found that their most receptive audience was the acculturating elite" without implying that those elite were already acculturating before the missionaries got there.

    Skill tested: Inference · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Out of Scope: earlier contacts18% picked this

    could have been the result of earlier contacts

    Nothing in the 2nd or 3rd makes it seem like McLoughlin is saying, "You guys are wrong --- the missionaries in the 1820s didn't acculturate the Cherokee. There were actually missionaries prior to the 1820s that did so."

  4. Too Strong3% picked this

    would not have occurred without the encouragement of the United

    Too Strong: would not without Opposite, if anything This answer sounds more like the Old view that McLoughlin is fighting. The Old view is thinking that the combo of missionaries and U.S. government "actively promoting acculturalization" is what caused the Cherokee acculturalization in the 1820s. McLoughlin is saying, "No, the Cherokee were in control of their own destiny. Some of them wanted to assimilate, for different reasons."

  5. Wrong POV10% picked this

    was primarily a result of the influence of White traders living

    The White traders are brought up in the 4th paragraph as a potential source of acculturalization that happened earlier than the 1820s. And this is the author talking, not McLoughlin. In fact, the author is specifically complaining that McLoughlin failed to attribute acculturalization to the presence of these White traders.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free