Reading Comprehension

PT17 · S4 · P4 · Q23 Causes of Saharan Drought

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Some meteorologists have insisted that the severity of the drought in sub-Saharan West Africa and its long duration (nearly 40 years to date) must be a sign of a long-term alteration in climate.

Topic

Theories about the cause of the long-term drought in sub-Saharan West Africa, focusing on the "Northern Hemisphere cooling" hypothesis

Framework

Challenge Position

Main Point

Although some meteorologists attribute the sub-Saharan drought to a cooling of the Northern Hemisphere, the evidence actually does not support this cooling hypothesis. The Most Valuable Sentence: Appears in the first sentence of the last paragraph:

P1: Introduction of the Cooling Hypothesis

Some meteorologists think the persistent drought in sub-Saharan West Africa is due to long-term climate change, specifically the cooling of the Northern Hemisphere. This theory links the cooling trend from 1945 to the early 1970s to increased atmospheric dust reflecting sunlight. The cooling was strongest in the higher latitudes, fitting with how sunlight passes through more atmosphere the farther north you go.

P2: Mechanism of the Hypothesis

Proponents of the cooling theory say that cooler temperatures in the north create new pressure differences, pushing the circumpolar vortex (a band of high-altitude winds) farther south, which in turn pushes the monsoon rains away from sub-Saharan Africa. They also worry that this change could become self-reinforcing due to increased ice and snow reflecting more sunlight.

P3: Evidence Against the Hypothesis

But, actually, the evidence for the cooling hypothesis is weak. For example, there was a rainy period in the sub-Sahara during one of the biggest Northern Hemisphere cool-downs in the 1950s, and by the 1980s, when the drought was severe, the Northern Hemisphere was actually warming a bit. Plus, when considering water temperatures, recent analyses cast even more doubt on whether the cooling happened as claimed.

23.

The author’s attitude toward the cooling hypothesis is best described as one of

  1. vehement opposition

    Too Strong

    The author isn't vehemently opposed (which is a very, very strong sense of certainty / conviction). The author is saying that, "The notion that the drought is caused by cooling is, in fact, not well supported". Her final sentence says, "further doubt has been cast on the hypothesis by ..." So the author is saying, "This hypothesis is not looking good. It's not well supported. Lots of doubt has been cast on it." But this answer is saying, "This hypothesis is dead wrong. I am strongly opposed to it."

    27% picked this

  2. Correct

    cautious skepticism

    Why this is right

    This is our best match for "not well supported / further doubt has been cast". It's negative but soft enough to accommodate the fact that the author isn't saying for sure that the theory is wrong.

    Skill tested: Author's Attitude · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    67% picked this

  3. growing ambivalence

    Too Mixed

    "Ambivalent" means a mix of feelings -- some positive, some negative. We don't have any textual support for some positive attitude toward the cooling hypothesis. The author's remarks are purely negative: "not well supported / contrary to its predictions / further doubt has been cast".

    5% picked this

  4. guarded enthusiasm

    Opposite

    We're looking for something on the negative side of the spectrum: "The notion that the drought is caused by cooling is, in fact, not well supported / contrary to the predictions of the hypothesis / further doubt has been cast".

    1% picked this

  5. strong support

    Opposite

    We're looking for something on the negative side of the spectrum: "The notion that the drought is caused by cooling is, in fact, not well supported / contrary to the predictions of the hypothesis / further doubt has been cast".

    0% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free