Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT17 S4 P4 Q23 Explanation

Causes of Saharan Drought

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsAuthor's AttitudeScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Some meteorologists have insisted that the severity of the drought in sub-Saharan West Africa and its long duration (nearly 40 years to date) must be a sign of a long-term alteration in climate. Among the theories proposed to explain this change, one hypothesis that has gained widespread attention attributes the drought to north, and so have to pass through more dust-laden atmosphere on the way to the Earth.

Since winds are set in motion by differences in air pressure caused by unequal heating of the atmosphere, supporters of the cooling hypothesis have argued that a growing temperature differential between the unusually cool middle and high latitudes and the warm tropical latitudes is causing a southward expansion of the circumpolar vortex—the away from the Earth, to further cooling, and, indirectly, to further drought in sub-Saharan West Africa.

Despite these dire predictions, and even though the current African drought has lasted longer than any other in this century, the notion that the drought is caused by cooling of the Northern Hemisphere is, in fact, not well supported. Contrary to the predictions of the cooling hypothesis, during one period of rapid well as land are taken into account, the Northern Hemisphere may not have cooled at all.

What this question is testing

Author's Attitude

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
23.

The author’s attitude toward the cooling hypothesis is best described as

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong25% picked this

    vehement

    The author isn't vehemently opposed (which is a very, very strong sense of certainty / conviction). The author is saying that, "The notion that the drought is caused by cooling is, in fact, not well supported". Her final sentence says, "further doubt has been cast on the hypothesis by ..." So the author is saying, "This hypothesis is not looking good. It's not well supported. Lots of doubt has been cast on it." But this answer is saying, "This hypothesis is dead wrong. I am strongly opposed to it."

  2. Correct68% picked this

    cautious

    Why this is right

    This is our best match for "not well supported / further doubt has been cast". It's negative but soft enough to accommodate the fact that the author isn't saying for sure that the theory is wrong.

    Skill tested: Author's Attitude · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Too Mixed6% picked this

    growing

    "Ambivalent" means a mix of feelings -- some positive, some negative. We don't have any textual support for some positive attitude toward the cooling hypothesis. The author's remarks are purely negative: "not well supported / contrary to its predictions / further doubt has been cast".

  4. Opposite1% picked this

    guarded

    We're looking for something on the negative side of the spectrum: "The notion that the drought is caused by cooling is, in fact, not well supported / contrary to the predictions of the hypothesis / further doubt has been cast".

  5. Opposite0% picked this

    strong

    We're looking for something on the negative side of the spectrum: "The notion that the drought is caused by cooling is, in fact, not well supported / contrary to the predictions of the hypothesis / further doubt has been cast".

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free