Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT17 S4 P2 Q15 Explanation

Hard Cases

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsPrimary PurposeLaw

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Legal cases can be termed “hard” cases if they raise issues that are highly controversial, issues about which people with legal training disagree. The ongoing debate over the completeness of the law usually concerns the extent “legally determinate”, or decidable according to existing law.

H. L. A. Hart’s The Concept of Law is still the clearest and most persuasive statement of both the standard theory of hard cases and the standard theory of law on which it rests. For Hart, the law consists of legal rules formulated in general terms; these terms he calls “open textured,” example, moral and political) grounds, and thereby exercise judicial discretion to make, rather than apply, law.

In Ronald Dworkin’s view the law is richer than Hart would grant; he denies that the law consists solely of explicit rules. The law also includes principles that do not depend for their legal status on any prior official recognition or enactment. Dworkin claims that many cases illustrate the existence of legal need for judicial discretion do not follow from the existence of open texture in legal rules.

It would be a mistake, though, to dispute Hart’s theory of hard cases on this basis alone. If Hart’s claim about the “open texture” of general terms is true, then we should expect to find legal indeterminacies even if the law consists of principles in addition to rules. Legal principles, as well meaning. Most interesting and controversial cases will occur in the penumbra of both rules and principles.

What this question is testing

Primary Purpose

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
15.

In the passage, the author is primarily

Answer choices

  1. Trap3% picked this

    outlining the problems that might be faced by a legislature attempting to create a complete body of law that would prevent judges from

  2. Trap24% picked this

    justifying the idea that “hard” cases will always exist in the practice of law, no matter what laws are written

  3. Trap2% picked this

    presenting evidence to support Dworkin’s idea that legal rules apply in an all-or-nothing fashion, whereas legal principles apply

  4. Trap4% picked this

    critiquing the concept of the open texture of legal terms as a conceptual flaw in

  5. Correct69% picked this

    demonstrating that Dworkin’s concept of legal principles does not form the basis for a successful attack on Hart’s

    Why this is right

    Answer E is correct.

    Skill tested: Primary Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free