Recent unexpectedly heavy rainfalls in

Answer choices

1. A

   Unclear Impact1% picked this

   Water rationing was imposed in the city in three of the

   Can we say, "Since rationing happened in 3 of the last 5 years, it's going to be necessary again this summer"? Hmmm, it's unclear. In order for us to use a past = present type logic, we need to know that the past and the present are relevantly similar. In those 3 years where there was rationing, was there also an unusually severe drought that necessitated it? In those 3 years where there was rationing, was there anything like our recent unexpected heavy rainfalls? Given that this year's rain was an unexpected anomaly, the author has good reason to argue that this year is different from years past, so it makes it harder for us to argue "if there was water rationing in the recent past, then there will be again this summer".

   1%
2. B

   No Impact17% picked this

   A small part of the city’s water supply is obtained from deep underground water systems that are

   This seems like a fact that is unchanging from one year to the next. It doesn't help us argue that "we will need water rationing this summer". If this answer said that "the vast majority of the city's water supply comes from deep underground stuff that isn't affected by rainfall", that would weaken, because it would make it seem like the evidence isn't really relevant towards the conclusion.

   17%
3. C

   Correct68% picked this

   The water company’s capacity to pump water to customers has not kept up with the increased demand created by population

   Why this is right

   Does this help us argue that we will still need water rationing this summer? Sure. We can say that even though we're good to go now from the standpoint of our "water bank account" (the reservoirs and streams are full), we aren't good to go in terms of our ability to deliver water from there to the people in the city. There has been population growth, so there are more people turning on their faucets at the same time. The water company's ability to pump water to them has not kept up with this increased demand, so the water company may have to still use rationing as a way to make sure the city residents aren't asking for more water at one time than the water company can deliver. This correct answer would have been darn near impossible to predict, but that's Strengthen / Weaken for you. It's more important that we approach the answers with a fuzzy goal. In this case, we should be looking at each answer thinking, "Could I use this to argue that water rationing may still be necessary this summer?"

   Skill tested: Weaken · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

   68%
4. D

   No Impact2% picked this

   The long-range weather forecast predicts lower-than-average temperatures for

   Can we argue that "because this summer is going to be cooler than average, we'll still need water rationing"? There isn't really any common sense connection between cooler temps and water rationing.

   2%
5. E

   No Impact12% picked this

   In most years the city receives less total precipitation in the summer than it receives

   This answer is saying "it's normal" for there to be less rain during the summer. But the evidence said "we had an abnormal amount of rain" filling up our reservoirs and streams. So we can't really argue that "light rain during summer = we'll still need water rationing this year", because we're not addressing the premise that we have an atypical surplus of water to start the season.

   12%