Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT15 S2 Q17 Explanation

Most people believe that yawning

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsFlaw

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Most people believe that yawning is most powerfully triggered by seeing someone else yawn. This belief about yawning is widespread not only today, but also has been commonplace in many parts of the world in the past, if we are to believe historians must be the most irresistible cause of yawning.

What this question is testing

Flaw

Your task

Describe the reasoning error the argument actually commits.

Common trap

Answers that name a real logical flaw the argument doesn't actually make.

Winning move

Articulate the gap in the reasoning yourself, then match it to the choice that describes that gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
17.

The argument is most vulnerable to which one of the

Answer choices

  1. Wrong Flaw21% picked this

    It attempts to support its conclusion solely by restating that conclusion

    This refers to the famous Circular Reasoning flaw, in which the conclusion restates the evidence. The conclusion is certainly very similarly stated, but there is a big difference between saying "Most people believe X is true" and saying "X is true". Also, the author has a second premise: "not only do they believe it nowadays, they've believed it throughout history". A circular argument basically means there were no premises. If you can isolate at least one supporting idea that is distinct from the conclusion, then it's probably not circular.

  2. Not Accurate20% picked this

    It cites the evidence of historians of popular culture in direct support of a claim that lies outside

    Does the argument cite the evidence of historians of popular culture? Yes. Is that in direct support of a claim that lies outside their expertise? No, not really. It's adding heft to the idea that most people (currently) believe that seeing someone else yawn is the most powerful trigger of yawning. What people believe in this timeframe or that one, in this area or that one, seems like it would be within the expertise of historians of popular culture. A widely held belief of a given society seems like exactly the sort of thing that historians of popular culture would be studying. Another famous flaw is Inappropriate Appeal (to emotion / to opinion / to a purported expert). This answer is describing that third version. But when that third version is the problem, it would be something weirder like "Do nitrogen and helium form covalent bonds? We asked historians of popular culture".

  3. Wrong Flaw2% picked this

    It makes a sweeping generalization about yawning based on evidence drawn from a limited number

    This describes the famous Sampling flaw, but the argument doesn't go from "because it was true in these cases, it must be generally true". The author is saying "because most people now and in years past believe that X is true, X is true."

  4. Correct45% picked this

    It supports its conclusion by appealing solely to opinion in a matter that

    Why this is right

    Does the author support her conclusion solely by appealing to opinion? Yes. She references the belief (i.e. opinion) of most people nowadays as well as that of people from disparate societies in years past. Is the matter being discussed largely factual? Yeah, it should be. Since yawning is a biological behavior, it's most powerful trigger would be something we would assess by understanding the physiology of how yawning works and what in the body causes it.

    Skill tested: Flaw · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Contradicted12% picked this

    It takes for granted that yawns have no cause other than the

    It never presumes that "seeing someone else yawn" is the only cause of yawning; it's saying that it's the most irresistible cause, implying that there are other causes of yawning that are just less powerful.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free