Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT149 S2 P4 Q23 Explanation

Charlotte Perkins Gilman

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsOrganizationHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

The novelist and social theorist Charlotte Perkins Gilman, whose writings were widely read and discussed in the early twentieth century, played an important role in the debate about the theories of Charles Darwin and their application to society. Darwin’s theory of evolution did not directly apply to social ideology, but various intellectuals of a human society need not be competitive, but can emerge through collective action within society.

Gilman identified herself with this latter ideological camp and applied evolutionary theory in the movement for social change. The central thesis of this group of Social Darwinists was that although people, like all life, are the products of natural evolutionary forces, the principles of change that determine the development of organisms have in work that is societally relevant and that makes the best use of that person’s talents.

Gilman was not merely engaged in an intellectual debate. Motivated by her ethical vision and convinced of the plasticity of human nature, Gilman vehemently sought to break the molds into which people, especially women, had been thrust. In both her fiction and her social theory she urges women to further social evolution of a balance that would include what she saw as female qualities of cooperation and nurturance.

What this question is testing

Organization

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
23.

Which one of the following sequences most accurately expresses the organization of

Answer choices

  1. Correct74% picked this

    The author identifies a particular individual as a proponent of one of two versions of a theory, and then describes how that individual drew

    Why this is right

    1st ingredient: the author identifies Gilman as a proponent of the latter version of Social Darwinism, which sought to proactively improve society. 2nd ingredient: the 2nd paragraph describes how Gilman drew practical implications from Darwin's theory (we humans have an ethical responsibility to consciously evolve our societies). 3rd ingredient: the 3rd (and some of the 2nd) paragraph detail some of the specific ways that Gilman thinks society should be reformed.

    Skill tested: Organization · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Bad Last Ingredient4% picked this

    The author describes the relationship of a particular individual to an intellectual community, characterizes in general terms a theory held by that individual, contrasts

    We can tell that "rejects one of two competing theories" is not at all a match for the final paragraph. The final paragraph just describes Gilman's ideas for how society should evolve going forward. There's no author's voice in the final paragraph, so there's no way for the author to be rejecting a theory.

  3. Bad Last Ingredient5% picked this

    The author proposes an interpretation of a particular individual’s writings, explains how those writings relate to a more general theoretical context, and then argues

    Does the final paragraph consist of the author arguing for a proposed interpretation of Gilman's writings? No, the final paragraph just describes Gilman's ideas for how society should evolve going forward. The author just describes and relates Gilman's ideas without offering any good/bad commentary on them.

  4. Bad 2nd Ingredient15% picked this

    The author describes some reasoning used by a group of theorists, evaluates that reasoning, attributes similar reasoning to a particular individual, and then shows

    The final ingredient here is probably usable enough that we would want to read the rest of the answer. The final paragraph feels like how Gilman's evaluation of Darwin's theory applies to specific ideas she has about how society should be reformed. Technically, the last ingredient is not accurate, but it's close enough that we probably wouldn't reject the answer by only reading that ingredient. If we rewind to the start, the first ingredient is okay; the first paragraph describes the reasoning of two different groups of theorists (the two different flavors of Social Darwinists). But the 2nd ingredient is where we can bail from this answer with certainty. The author never evaluates their reasoning. He never indicates that he agrees more with one of them than the other. He just stays in a descriptive mode the whole time. We don't know the author's evaluation of any of the characters in this passage.

  5. Bad Last Ingredient1% picked this

    The author presents some historical facts about the development of a scientific theory, explains the role played by a particular individual in the formulation

    Does the final paragraph summarize critics' responses to Gilman's work? Heck no. The final paragraph just describes Gilman's ideas for how society should evolve going forward. There are no critics discussed in the final paragraph at all.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free