Reading Comprehension

PT149 · S2 · P4 · Q23 Charlotte Perkins Gilman

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

The novelist and social theorist Charlotte Perkins Gilman, whose writings were widely read and discussed in the early twentieth century, played an important role in the debate about the theories of Charles Darwin and their application to society.

Topic

Charlotte Perkins Gilman's views on Social Darwinism and her advocacy for social change, especially regarding women's roles in society.

Framework

Challenge Position + Highlight Noteworthy

Main Point

Gilman belonged to a school of thought that believed humans, unlike other organisms, could and should consciously direct their own societal evolution, and she advocated for ethical responsibility and active efforts—especially by women—to reshape society beyond traditional, gender-based roles. (The statement that best encapsulates the main point appears at the end of paragraph 2 and beginning of paragraph 3: )

P1: Introduction to Gilman and Social Darwinism Debate

Gilman was a key figure in debates about how Darwin’s theory of evolution should apply to society. She aligned with Social Darwinists who thought social evolution could be shaped by human action, not just competition, and who believed collective human effort could direct societal progress.

P2: Gilman’s Ideology and Ethical Responsibility

Gilman believed evolutionary principles made it possible—and even ethically necessary—for humans to consciously shape social evolution by engaging in meaningful work, focusing on contributions that serve society and make use of individual talents.

P3: Gilman’s Activism and Vision for Women’s Roles

Gilman acted on her beliefs, pushing for women (and others) to break out of restrictive social roles to help reorganize society. She envisioned getting rid of strictly defined, hierarchical gender roles, arguing that past male-driven competitiveness was once useful for society’s growth, but that society’s future needed to emphasize cooperation and nurturance—traits she associated with women.

23.

Which one of the following sequences most accurately expresses the organization of the passage?

  1. Correct

    The author identifies a particular

    Why this is right

    1st ingredient: the author identifies Gilman as a proponent of the latter version of Social Darwinism, which sought to proactively improve society. 2nd ingredient: the 2nd paragraph describes how Gilman drew practical implications from Darwin's theory (we humans have an ethical responsibility to consciously evolve our societies). 3rd ingredient: the 3rd (and some of the 2nd) paragraph detail some of the specific ways that Gilman thinks society should be reformed.

    Skill tested: Organization · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    77% picked this

  2. The author describes the relationship

    Bad Last Ingredient

    We can tell that "rejects one of two competing theories" is not at all a match for the final paragraph. The final paragraph just describes Gilman's ideas for how society should evolve going forward. There's no author's voice in the final paragraph, so there's no way for the author to be rejecting a theory.

    3% picked this

  3. The author proposes an interpretation

    Bad Last Ingredient

    Does the final paragraph consist of the author arguing for a proposed interpretation of Gilman's writings? No, the final paragraph just describes Gilman's ideas for how society should evolve going forward. The author just describes and relates Gilman's ideas without offering any good/bad commentary on them.

    5% picked this

  4. The author describes some reasoning

    Bad 2nd Ingredient

    The final ingredient here is probably usable enough that we would want to read the rest of the answer. The final paragraph feels like how Gilman's evaluation of Darwin's theory applies to specific ideas she has about how society should be reformed. Technically, the last ingredient is not accurate, but it's close enough that we probably wouldn't reject the answer by only reading that ingredient. If we rewind to the start, the first ingredient is okay; the first paragraph describes the reasoning of two different groups of theorists (the two different flavors of Social Darwinists). But the 2nd ingredient is where we can bail from this answer with certainty. The author never evaluates their reasoning. He never indicates that he agrees more with one of them than the other. He just stays in a descriptive mode the whole time. We don't know the author's evaluation of any of the characters in this passage.

    15% picked this

  5. The author presents some historical

    Bad Last Ingredient

    Does the final paragraph summarize critics' responses to Gilman's work? Heck no. The final paragraph just describes Gilman's ideas for how society should evolve going forward. There are no critics discussed in the final paragraph at all.

    1% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free