Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT149 S2 P3 Q20 Explanation

Social Norms & Intellectual Property

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsStrengthenLaw

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Passage A Comedians are not amused when their jokes are stolen, and for that reason we might expect joke-stealing disputes to ripen into lawsuits occasionally. Copyright is the most relevant body of law; formally, it applies to jokes and comedic routines. Yet copyright infringement lawsuits between rival comedians are all but unheard copyright law simply does not provide comedians with a cost-effective way of protecting their comedic material.

Conventional intellectual property wisdom holds that absent formal legal protection, there would be scant production of creative works, as potential creators would be deterred by the unlikelihood of recouping the cost of their creations. If there is no effective legal protection against comedians keep cranking out new material night after night?

The answer to this question is that, in stand-up comedy, social norms substitute for intellectual property law. Taken as a whole, this norms system governs a wide array of issues that generally parallel those ordered by copyright law. These norms are not merely hortatory. They are enforced with sanctions, including simple badmouthing use and transfer, impose sanctions on transgressors, and maintain substantial incentives to invest in new material.

Passage B Accomplished chefs consider their recipes to be a very valuable form of intellectual property. At the same time, recipes are not a form of innovation that is effectively covered by current intellectual property laws. Recipes are rarely patentable, and combinations of ingredients cannot be copyrighted. Legal protections are potentially available these norms function in a manner quite similar to law-based intellectual property systems.

First, a chef must not copy another chef’s recipe innovation exactly. The function of this norm is analogous to patenting in that the community acknowledges the right of a recipe inventor to exclude others from practicing his or her invention, even if all the information required to do so is publicly available. as the authors of that information. This norm operates in a manner analogous to copyright protection.

What this question is testing

Strengthen

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion more likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that are consistent with the argument but add no real support, or that strengthen a claim the argument doesn't make.

Winning move

Locate the gap between evidence and conclusion, then pick the choice that closes it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
20.

Which one of the following, if true, would most clearly support the argument made

Answer choices

  1. No Impact28% picked this

    There is no social norm preventing chefs from using colleagues’ recipes as inspiration, as long as those recipes

    It doesn't seem like hearing about a "lack of a 4th norm" would strengthen the idea that these three norms function quite similar to law-based IP systems.

  2. Correct63% picked this

    Chefs are significantly more likely to deny requested information to colleagues whom they believe have violated

    Why this is right

    This points to negative repercussions for chefs who don't adhere to "the rules". This helps strengthen the parallel to IP legal systems, in which those who violate the rules would be subject to some sort of punishment.

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Not About Norms3% picked this

    Recipes published in cookbooks are protected by copyright law from being published

    This is about copyright law protecting chefs. We're looking to strengthen the notion that the three norms effectively protect chefs, as an IP system would.

  4. Opposite1% picked this

    The community of chefs is too small to effectively enforce sanctions against those who violate

    This goes the other way from correct answer (B). It makes it sound like the social norms are not effective at enforcing the rules against transgressors, the law legal protection would.

  5. Weakens, if Anything5% picked this

    In practice it is virtually impossible to determine whether a chef has copied a colleague’s recipe exactly or has

    Since this takes one of the three norms and makes it sound like it's actually an impossible rule to enforce, it's just weakening the potential efficacy of the three norms. Meanwhile, the question stem wants us to support the idea that these three norms essentially provide chefs the protection of an IP system.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free