Reading Comprehension

PT149 · S2 · P3 · Q20 Social Norms & Intellectual Property

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Passage A Comedians are not amused when their jokes are stolen, and for that reason we might expect joke-stealing disputes to ripen into lawsuits occasionally.

Topic

The protection of creative content (jokes and recipes) among comedians and chefs, and how social norms substitute for ineffective or unavailable legal protection.

Framework

Answer / Explain

Main Point

Even though comedians and chefs can’t rely on traditional intellectual property law to protect their jokes or recipes, both groups use strong social norms within their communities to regulate ownership, copying, and credit—effectively serving a legal-like function and preserving incentives for creativity. (Passage A, paragraph 3) (Passage B, paragraph 1)

P1: Comedy and Copyright Law

Comedians rarely take legal action against joke thieves, even though jokes can be technically protected by copyright. That’s because the cost of litigation is high, legal success is uncertain, and copyright law just doesn’t work well for comedians in practice.

P2: The Puzzle of Comedy Innovation

But if the law doesn’t protect comedians, why do they bother coming up with so much new material?

P3: Social Norms Among Comedians

It’s because comedians have their own system of social norms—a set of unwritten community rules—backed up by consequences like damaging someone’s reputation. This informal “norms system” does most of what copyright law would do: it lets comedians claim ownership, control use, punish joke theft, and gives them a reason to keep coming up with new ideas.

20.

Which one of the following, if true, would most clearly support the argument made in passage B?

  1. There is no social norm

    No Impact

    It doesn't seem like hearing about a "lack of a 4th norm" would strengthen the idea that these three norms function quite similar to law-based IP systems.

    29% picked this

  2. Correct

    Chefs are significantly more likely

    Why this is right

    This points to negative repercussions for chefs who don't adhere to "the rules". This helps strengthen the parallel to IP legal systems, in which those who violate the rules would be subject to some sort of punishment.

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    63% picked this

  3. Recipes published in cookbooks are

    Not About Norms

    This is about copyright law protecting chefs. We're looking to strengthen the notion that the three norms effectively protect chefs, as an IP system would.

    3% picked this

  4. The community of chefs is

    Opposite

    This goes the other way from correct answer (B). It makes it sound like the social norms are not effective at enforcing the rules against transgressors, the law legal protection would.

    1% picked this

  5. In practice it is virtually

    Weakens, if Anything

    Since this takes one of the three norms and makes it sound like it's actually an impossible rule to enforce, it's just weakening the potential efficacy of the three norms. Meanwhile, the question stem wants us to support the idea that these three norms essentially provide chefs the protection of an IP system.

    5% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free