Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT149 S1 Q5 Explanation

Researchers examined 100 people

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsStrengthen

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Researchers examined 100 people suffering from herniated disks in their backs. Five of them were found to have a defect in a particular gene. The researchers also examined 100 people who had no problems with the disks in their backs; none had genetic defect increases the likelihood of herniated disks.

What this question is testing

Strengthen

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion more likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that are consistent with the argument but add no real support, or that strengthen a claim the argument doesn't make.

Winning move

Locate the gap between evidence and conclusion, then pick the choice that closes it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
5.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the

Answer choices

  1. Weakens, if Anything0% picked this

    The researchers also examined a group of 100 people who did not have the defective gene; 80 were found to have

    This answer is offering what seems to be Effect w/o Cause, because it's talking about data points that have the supposed effect (herniated disk) but don't have the supposed cause (genetic defect). But we already had 95 examples in the argument of people who have a herniated disk but don't have a defective gene. So getting 80 more with that profile doesn't change anything.

  2. Unclear Impact1% picked this

    When the researchers examined a group of 100 people with the defective gene, they found that 2 of them had

    This certainly doesn't seem like impressive evidence for the author's conclusion. If he thinks that this defective gene increases the odds of a herniated disk, then it's not very compelling to say that 2% of people with the gene have herniated disks. But this answer could potentially still strengthen. We would need to know what percent of the general population ends up with herniated disks. If only 1% of the general population gets a herniated disk, but 2% of the population with this defective gene gets a herniated disk, then that would strengthen the idea that this gene increases the likelihood of getting a herniated disk.

  3. Correct98% picked this

    When the researchers examined the families of the 5 subjects who had the defective gene, they found that 30 family members also had the

    Why this is right

    This adds more data points in which the supposed cause (defective gene) and supposed effect (higher likelihood of herniated disk) go hand in hand. This one is 30 for 30. All 30 of the family members that had the defective gene suffered from herniated disks. That's strong evidence that this defective gene is influencing risk of herniated disks.

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Weakens0% picked this

    Another team of researchers examined a different group of 100 people who suffered from herniated disks, and they found that none of

    This is giving us Cause w/o Effect weakening data points. These 100 people have the supposed cause (defective gene) but don't have the supposed effect (herniated disk).

  5. Weakens, if Anything0% picked this

    When the researchers examined the family of one of the subjects who did not suffer from herniated disks, they found 30 family members who

    This only provides us with 20 Effect w/o Cause data points, which weaken the argument. These 20 people had the supposed effect (herniated disks) but didn't have the supposed cause (defective gene).

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free