Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT149 S1 Q1 Explanation

The mayoral race in Bensburg

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsWeaken

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

The mayoral race in Bensburg is a choice between Chu, a prodevelopment candidate, and Lewis, who favors placing greater limits on development. Prodevelopment candidates have won in the Chu will probably defeat Lewis.

What this question is testing

Weaken

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion less likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that look negative but attack a claim the argument never relied on.

Winning move

Find the assumption the argument depends on, then pick the choice that undermines it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
1.

Which one of the following statements, if true, most weakens

Answer choices

  1. Strengthens, if anything0% picked this

    Lewis has extensive experience in national politics, but not in

    This potentially says something negative about Lewis (she's running for local mayoral office but doesn't have much experience in city politics). Saying something negative about Lewis would strengthen. In general, though, answers like this that are not comparative have unclear impact when we're judging a comparison. After all, for all we know Chu is also inexperienced in city politics.

  2. Strengthens, if anything1% picked this

    Prodevelopment mayoral candidates in Bensburg generally attract more financial backing for

    This would help the author's case that a prodevelopment candidate is probably going to win: 1. such a candidate has won the last six elections 2. such a candidate is better funded (which makes winning elections easier)

  3. Correct92% picked this

    Bensburg is facing serious new problems that most voters attribute

    Why this is right

    This shows us that Past ? Present, and it helps us to counterargue that Chu is not likely to win this election. Sure, in the past, voters have gone for the prodevelopment candidate, but it doesn't sound like the electorate is going to be as pro-development in this cycle. After all, there are serious new problems that most voters attribute to too much development. All those modifiers are important for giving this the punching strength we want. These problems didn't apply to past election cycles. And they are serious and the majority of voters think that development is to blame. So the candidacy of Lewis, who wants to place some limits on development, is starting to sound pretty appetizing to these local voters.

    Skill tested: Weaken · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. No Impact2% picked this

    Lewis once worked as an aide to a prodevelopment mayor

    This is too weak of a sentiment to move the needle. Just because she worked as an aide to a prodevelopment mayor doesn't change the fact that Lewis the candidate is running on a platform of limiting development.

  5. No Impact5% picked this

    Chu was not thought of as a prodevelopment politician before

    This is too weak of a sentiment to move the needle. Just because Chu wasn't previously thought of as prodevelopment doesn't change the fact that Chu the candidate is running on a platform of favoring development.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free