Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT147 S3 P2 Q13 Explanation

Artistic and Cultural Patrimony in Mali

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsAuthor's AttitudeLaw

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

The government of Mali passed a law against excavating and exporting the wonderful terra-cotta sculptures from the old city of Djenne-jeno, but it could not enforce it. And it certainly could not afford to fund thousands of archaeological excavations. The result was that many fine Djenne-jeno terra-cotta sculptures were illicitly excavated in could have learned had the sites been preserved by careful archaeology—may now never be known.

It has been natural to condemn such pillaging. And, through a number of declarations from UNESCO and other international bodies, a protective doctrine has evolved concerning the ownership of many forms of cultural property (the “UNESCO doctrine”). Essentially the doctrine provides that cultural artifacts should be regarded as the property of the all antiquities that originate within their borders to be state property that cannot be freely exported.

Accordingly, it seems reasonable that the government of Mali, within whose borders the Djenne-jeno antiquities are buried, be the one to regulate excavating Djenne-jeno and to decide where the statues should go. Regrettably, and this is a painful irony, regulations prohibiting export and requiring repatriation can discourage recording and preserving information about objects taken illegally out of Mali have the very evidence they need to seize the figure.

Suppose that from the beginning, Mali had been helped by UNESCO to exercise its trusteeship of the Djenne-jeno terra-cotta sculptures by licensing excavations and educating people to recognize that such artifacts have greater value when they are removed carefully from the earth with accurate records of location. Suppose Mali had required that still have avoided the rules. But would this not have been better than what actually happened?

What this question is testing

Author's Attitude

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
13.

Which one of the following is an element of the author's attitude toward foreign collectors of terra-cotta

Answer choices

  1. Opposite, if anything4% picked this

    appreciation of their efforts to preserve

    The author doesn't indicate that she considers these rich collectors to be "preserving" these cultural artifacts. In fact, the following sentence (last of the 1st paragraph) is lamenting how these sculptures ended up in the possession of the collectors, rather than ending up in possession of researchers, fearing that now we will not be able to preserve as much knowledge about this culture.

  2. Correct63% picked this

    approval of their aesthetic

    Why this is right

    This is supported by the fact that the author says these terra-cotta sculptures are "wonderful" (1st sentence) and then says that the foreign collectors "rightly admired them" (3rd sentence).

    Skill tested: Author's Attitude · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Too Strong: dismay at their failure10% picked this

    dismay at their failure to take action against illegal exportation of

    There's no text in this first paragraph that calls out these collectors for failing to report their illegal art dealer to the cops. It's not clear that the foreign collectors have any idea they're doing anything wrong. The people selling them the sculptures may be lying and pretending that the sculptures were legally excavated and exported.

  4. Out of Scope10% picked this

    frustration with their lack of concern for the people

    Out of Scope: lack of concern for Mali There's no text in this first paragraph that calls out these collectors for failing to care about the people in Mali. It's not clear that the foreign collectors even know that buying one of these sculptures would be harming or concerning the people of Mali in any way.

  5. Out of Scope: motives12% picked this

    sympathy with their

    This is very similar to (B). We know the author thinks these sculptures are wonderful and that the collectors are right to admire them. So, seemingly it's not that crazy an idea to say this author would sympathize with their motive for buying these sculptures. "Even though it sucks that these foreign collectors deprived Mali the opportunity to learn from these artifacts, I sympathize with the motive of a foreign collector who wanted to own one of these wonderful sculptures." This notion is just a little more speculative than (B). Here, we have to assume that the collectors were motivated to own some wonderful art, in order to think that the author would sympathize with them. But if the collectors are planning to re-sell them, or if they were aware they were buying black market art and still did it ... the author might stop sympathizing with their motives. Since we don't really hear anything about their motives for buying the sculptures, only about their aesthetic admiration of the sculptures, we have a more supportable option in (B). I think this answer is reasonable enough that it might be a credited response, if it were actually the best available answer.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free