Reading Comprehension

PT147 · S2 · P3 · Q17 Mesolithic Woodland Clearings

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

It is generally accepted that woodland clearings were utilized by Mesolithic human populations (populations in Europe roughly 7,000 to 12,000 years ago) for food procurement.

Topic

Mesolithic woodland clearings: reassessing why ancient humans created and used them

Framework

Challenge Position

Main Point

While the standard explanation for prehistoric woodland clearings is that they were created or used by Mesolithic populations for economic reasons (mainly hunting and food procurement), the archaeological evidence for this is weak, and an alternative explanation—that clearings were social spaces associated with paths created out of fear of the wilderness—deserves more consideration. (The key "Most Valuable Sentence" summarizing the main point appears near the end: )

P1: The Economic (Hunting) Model and Its Weak Evidence

It's generally thought that Mesolithic people used woodland clearings for hunting/gathering, but there's little hard archaeological evidence directly linking clearings with economic activities.

P2: Ethnographic Support—and Its Limits

Most support for the "resource-procurement" (economic) model comes from studying recent cultures, not from direct evidence, and some ethnographic data points to alternative, noneconomic uses for clearings.

P3: Introducing the "Fear of Wilderness" Argument

Some theorists argue that fear of wild, wooded places has always shaped human behavior—not just in modern times—and if we apply this idea to Mesolithic people, it could change our view of why they cared about clearings.

17.

Which one of the following is most clearly an example of the kind of evidence that would lend support to the author’s proposal in the next-to-last paragraph?

  1. Mesolithic artwork that appears to

    No Impact: Unrelated to Goal

    There's no way to link this artwork to "fear of wildlife, spirits, or getting lost".

    17% picked this

  2. the ubiquity of paths and

    No Impact: Unrelated to Goal

    "Ubiquitous" means found everywhere. We can say that thirst traps are ubiquitous on Instagram, or that tattoos are ubiquitous in NBA locker rooms. The fact that paths/roads were found in pretty much any area densely settled by humans doesn't tell us why those paths existed. This answer doesn't connect at all to "fear of wildlife, spirits, or getting lost".

    6% picked this

  3. maps showing pathways used by

    No Impact: Unrelated to Goal

    There's no way to link these maps or the pathway they depict to "fear of wildlife, spirits, or getting lost".

    7% picked this

  4. survey results showing that modern

    Weaker Impact

    This helps somewhat, but the author's theory is that premodern people who lived full-time in nature were afraid of nature / spirits / getting lost. This answer is helping to establish that modern city dwellers are somewhat afraid of wilderness. It's possible that fear is emblematic of a timeless fear that has afflicted humanity and led to creating these woodland paths. But it's also possible that fear is just because modern city dwellers don't spend much time out in nature, so it's just fear of the unknown. It would be stronger evidence if we knew that modern people who live more in nature or spend lots of time in nature still have anxiety about the wilderness.

    8% picked this

  5. Correct

    rituals performed by certain recent

    Why this is right

    This beats (D) because even though both answers are about modern people, this answer is about "premodern" populations (i.e. isolated hunter-gatherer tribes with no access to our modern technology or living). Meanwhile, (D) was about full-on modern humans who live in cities. A recent premodern population is a much better comparison for prehistoric populations than is a recent city-dwelling population. And this answer provides a stronger link to the idea of "fear of wildlife / spirits / getting lost". (D) says people get heightened anxiety, whereas this says they perform full-on rituals for the sake of protection in the forest. You don't perform a ritual for the sake of protection in the forest, unless you're worried about being harmed in the forest.

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    62% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free