Reading Comprehension

PT147 · S2 · P2 · Q14 Eileen Grey

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one
Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step
81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Best known for her work with lacquer, Eileen Gray (1878–1976) had a fascinating and multifaceted artistic career: she became a designer of ornaments, furniture, interiors, and eventually homes.

Topic

Eileen Gray's innovative development as an artist and designer, from lacquer work to architecture, focusing on her integration of form, function, and detail.

Framework

Highlight Noteworthy

Main Point

Eileen Gray's career demonstrates a seamless progression from detailed lacquer work to furniture, interior, and architectural design, always unified by her attention to both aesthetics and function—blurring boundaries between art, furniture, and architecture. ()

P1: Introduction and Artistic Sensibility

We get introduced to Gray's career and her specialization in lacquer, which matched her taste for straight lines and simple forms, in opposition to Art Nouveau's curves. The passage emphasizes her love for detail and her process of layering lacquer, a demanding art form.

P2: From Lacquer to Furniture—Functional Complexity

This paragraph discusses the structural challenges of lacquer work, noting Gray’s shift from flat panels to dynamic screens that serve as both art and architecture. It then details her move into furniture design, highlighting how she crafted functional, minimalist pieces often tailored for specific spaces, using modern materials.

P3: The Move to Architecture and Integration of Interiors/Exteriors

Finally, the passage explores how Gray’s philosophy evolved into architecture, emphasizing her belief in the inseparability of interior and exterior design. Her architectural work mirrored her lacquer sensibility: layered, interconnected, and functional, with innovations that dissolve the boundary between inside and outside.

14.

The passage most strongly suggests that the author would agree with which one of the following statements about Gray's architectural work?

It was considered by other
Too Strong
Too Strong: inconsistent Out of Scope: other architects The 3rd paragraph doesn't mention other architects or characterize Gray's work as being very atypical, against the grain, controversial, etc. Saying that her work was "inconsistent with sound principles of design" is like the harshest thing you could say to an architect. "You work contradicts basic principles of good design".
8% picked this
Her involvement in it was
Too Strong
Too Strong: radical shift Opposite, if anything The author seems to be stressing that Gray's work in architecture was consonant with her previous work; the previous work prefigured the architecture. Architecture for her was like work in lacquer. This answer is suggesting the opposite, saying Gray's work in architecture was a radical shift from what she was doing before.
36% picked this
Correct
The public is less knowledgeable
Why this is right
This is supported by the very first line in the passage. Since Gray is "best known for her lacquer", then by definition the public is less knowledgeable about every other thing Gray ever did. If Gray once trained some meerkats to dance the Macarena, the public would still be less knowledgeable about that than about at least some of her other work, because some of her other work is lacquer, and that's how the public best knows her. It's an almost unthinkably obnoxious correct answer. The question stem sends us confidently to the 3rd paragraph. We would have no way of knowing that they planned to test some obscure phrasing from the very beginning of the passage. It's enough to make you want to slap the test in the face. We can use this horrid problem as a reminder that they are sometimes playing cutesy games with us, and we might have to search in unexpected places to find the available support for the correct answer.
Skill tested: Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.
39% picked this
It has been less controversial
Out of Scope: critics and scholars
Just like (A), this answer talks about how other people reacted to her architectural work. The passage didn't give us any indication about how critics or scholars viewed her architecture.
2% picked this
Unlike her work in lacquer,
Too Strong: no Asian influence
We don't have any text to support the idea that there was no Asian influence on her architecture. Just because it wasn't mentioned doesn't mean it wasn't an influence. And the fact that it says "architecture for her was like work in the (established Asian art tradition) of lacquer" opens the door for the idea that there was some Asian influence.
15% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free