For a work to be rightly thought of as world literature, it must be received and interpreted within the writer’s own national tradition and within external national traditions.
Statements
conditionals (must, if)
world → received and interpreted w/in literature your and other national traditions
1. positive model for development of own tradition or 2. negative case of → in national bad thing to be avoided tradition or 3. image of radical otherness prompting refinement of tradition
Evaluate
Yikes, that last monstrosity definitely shouldn't be physically diagrammed on paper. Let's focus on Overlapping Concepts between the first and second sentence.
The one thing in both sentences is "interpreted w/in a national tradition".
Being considered world literature requires that you're interpreted in your nation's tradition as well as that of others. And there are 3 things that guarantee you'd be interpreted within a national tradition.
Are they the only 3 things that get you interpreted within a national tradition? No, not necessarily. But it's heavily insinuated that they are the only 3 things.
So it's pretty supportable for us to say that .
Goal
Look for something connecting world literature to those 3 ways of being interpreted as a national tradition.
But stay flexible. Ultimately we just want the most provable answer.