Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT146 S2 Q7 Explanation

Naturalist: Different nonhuman primate

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMost Supported

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Naturalist: Different nonhuman primate species exhibit many contrasts in behavior. If a zookeeper leaves a screwdriver within reach of a chimpanzee, the animal is likely to examine and play with it for a time, and then move on to something else. In the same circumstances, an orangutan is likely to pretend to orangutan may use the screwdriver to try to dismantle its cage.

What this question is testing

Most Supported

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
7.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong: the most1% picked this

    Orangutans are the most intelligent of

    This is an extreme language freebie. We only read about two nonhuman primates. Just because orangutans seemed like the more clever of the two doesn't mean we crown them #1 among all and say they're the most intelligent.

  2. Unsupported Comparison1% picked this

    Orangutans have better memories than chimpanzees

    The fact that some orangutans (at least one) initially ignored the screwdriver and "remembered" to go back to it later for the sake of dismantling the cage is not support for a global comparison between chimp memories and orangutans.

  3. Correct83% picked this

    Some nonhuman primates are capable of

    Why this is right

    This has very provable language. To support "some" we only need one example of something. Do we have an example of a nonhuman primate committing an act of deception? Does it qualify as deception when an orangutan pretends to ignore a tool and then later tries to sneakily grab the tool and plot an escape? Yes, definitely. In particular, we're guaranteed that it's an act of deception because the orangutan "pretends to ignore the tool". That means that the orangutan does notice the tool but is sending to zookeepers the deceptive impression that it doesn't notice it / isn't interested.

    Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Unsupported Comparison1% picked this

    Orangutans dislike being caged more than

    The fact that some orangutans (at least one) used the screwdriver to dismantle its cage does not support a global comparison between chimps and orangutans, in terms of who dislikes imprisonment more. Not only would one data point (an orangutan may) not support a broad comparison, but you also can't judge how much someone dislikes being caged based on whether or not they attempt a prison escape. Prisoners who aren't plotting an escape don't necessarily like being caged more than others. It's more likely that they are just more pessimistic or clueless about plotting a successful escape.

  5. Out of Scope: understand tool use14% picked this

    Not all nonhuman primates understand tool

    This answer is pretty tempting since it has very weak language. We only need one example of a nonhuman primate that doesn't understand tool use. Can we say that the chimps are examples of a primate that doesn't understand tool use? No, not really. The chimps actually pick up the screwdriver and "play with it for a time", which could easily indicate an understanding of tool use. Overall, it's a pretty extreme claim to say that a species "doesn't understand tool use", so we wouldn't want to extrapolate that big claim just from this screwdriver example.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free