Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT145 S3 P4 Q27 Explanation

African American Transnationalism

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsAnalogySociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

In contrast to the mainstream of U.S. historiography during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, African American historians of the period, such as George Washington Williams and W. E. B. DuBois, adopted a transnational perspective. This was true for several reasons, not the least of which was the necessity of doing Americans in the United States were to be treated honestly.

First, there was the problem of citizenship. Even after the adoption in 1868 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which defined citizenship, the question of citizenship for African Americans had not been genuinely resolved. Because of this, emigrationist sentiment was a central issue in black political discourse, and both issues a point of profound pessimism and had begun to question their allegiance to the United States.

Mainstream U.S. historiography was firmly rooted in a nationalist approach during this period; the glorification of the nation and a focus on the nation-state as a historical force were dominant. The expanding spheres of influence of Europe and the United States prompted the creation of new genealogies of nations, new myths about colonial empires was a distinct aspect of nationalism in the latter part of the nineteenth century.

Yet, for all their distrust of U.S. nationalism, most early black historians were themselves engaged in a sort of nation building. Deliberately or not, they contributed to the formation of a collective identity, reconstructing a glorious African past for the purposes of overturning degrading representations of blackness and establishing a firm cultural the history of a people scattered by force and circumstance, a history that began in Africa.

What this question is testing

Analogy

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
27.

As it is presented in the passage, the approach to history taken by mainstream U.S. historians of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries is most similar to

Answer choices

  1. Weak Match14% picked this

    An elected official writes a memo suggesting that because a particular course of action has been successful in the past, the government should continue

    "What worked in the past should work again in the future" doesn't seem to match any part of the 3rd paragraph. The mainstream historians are certainly discussing America's past, but there's no language about using the past as lessons about what to do in the future.

  2. Correct63% picked this

    A biographer of a famous novelist argues that the precocity apparent in certain of the novelist's early achievements confirms that her success

    Why this is right

    Tough answer. A precocious writer "showed unusual talent at an early stage". Innate talent means "they were born with it". It's pretty solid to match up "innate talent" with parts of the 3rd paragraph like "the genealogy of a nation / its temperament / its destiny". The "precocious early achievements" is harder to match up, but "the expanding spheres of influence of the US prompted the creation of thoughts about America's genealogy / temperament / destiny". Since these historians are writing in the late 1800s about an America that was only born 100 years prior and by the late 1800s had managed to expand from the eastern seaboard across more and more of the continent, it's pretty fair to call the westward expansion of America some of its early achievements. It's a lot of outside knowledge to make the context of that sentence work, but this is our best available answer. It reads better if you ask yourself, "Were these mainstream historians arguing that because America had so many early achievements, there must be something special / talented encoded in America's DNA?" Yeah, that sounds like them.

    Skill tested: Analogy · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Bad Match11% picked this

    A doctor maintains that because a certain medication was developed expressly for the treatment of an illness, it is the

    Were these historians saying that "because America was developed specifically to cure on problem, it is the best cure for that problem". Not really.

  4. Bad Match6% picked this

    A newspaper runs a series of articles in order to inform the public about the environmentally hazardous practices

    Were these mainstream historians writing things about America in order to inform the public about some potentially harmful things America does? Quite the opposite.

  5. Bad Match6% picked this

    A scientist gets the same result from an experiment several times and therefore concludes that its chemical reactions always

    In many ways this feels too similar to (A)'s sense of "If it was true in the past, it will be true again" for either of these answers to be correct. Were the mainstream historians "getting the same result from an experiment on America"? It's really hard to match up the idea of a scientist getting the same result from an experiment several times with the idea of historians writing puff pieces about how bad-ass America is. With an experiment, you don't know what result you'll get until you perform the experiment. With the mainstream historians, it sounds much more like they knew what sort of pro-America result they were trying to get from their writings.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free