Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT144 S4 Q17 Explanation

Ostrich farming requires far less

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMost Supported

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Ostrich farming requires far less acreage than cattle ranching requires, and ostriches reproduce much faster than cattle. Starting out in cattle ranching requires a large herd of cows, one bull, and at least two acres per cow. By contrast, two pairs of yearling ostriches and one acre of similar land are enough eventually bring in as much as five times what cattle ranching does.

What this question is testing

Most Supported

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
17.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the

Answer choices

  1. Correct80% picked this

    Two pairs of yearling ostriches are more expensive than a herd of cows

    Why this is right

    As we discussed, we were told (surprisingly) that the start-up costs for ostrich farming are greater than the costs for cattle farming. And yet here was the side-by-side comparison of what is needed to start up: CATTLE OSTRICHES one bull + two pairs (4) yearling ostriches large herd of cows two acres one acre of similar land per cow When it comes to land, we're definitely spending way more on Cattle farming, since we seem to need at least 20 acres there, whereas we need only 1 for ostriches. So the bigger price tag of ostrich farming's start-up costs would have to be because it's more expensive to buy "two pairs of yearlings" than it is to buy "one bull + a large herd of cows".

    Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Too Strong: not good1% picked this

    Cattle ranching is not a good source

    The fact that ostrich farming can eventually be a better source of income doesn't allow us to say that cattle ranching is not a good source of income. If you're a ritzy lawyer making $250k a year, you'd accurately say that "being a lawyer is a good source of income". The fact that some hedge fund manager or CEO might make five times what you do doesn't change that.

  3. Out of Scope1% picked this

    A cow consumes no more feed than an

    Out of Scope: amount of feed consumed We get no information about how much feed a cow vs. an ostrich consumes. That would relate more to the operating costs of cattle farming vs. ostrich farming, which we heard nothing about.

  4. Too Strong: average One-Claim Trap12% picked this

    The average ostrich farm generates almost five times as much profit as the

    We're only told that ostrich farming can bring in as much as five times the revenue of cattle farming. That's saying it's possible. This answer is saying it's typical. The average ostrich farm is making five times as much profit as the average cattle ranch. Our support for this answer would come purely from the final claim in the paragraph. We should always be nervous about picking an answer on Inference that's only supported by one claim. The name of the game here is to combine claims in order to derive the correct answer.

  5. Too Strong7% picked this

    Ostrich farmers typically lose money during their

    Too Strong: typically Out of Scope: lose money We get the sense from the final sentence that while there's a bigger buy-in risk with ostrich farming, it potentially has a bigger return on investment. But we have no way to justify the claim that more than 50% of ostrich farmers are losing money during their first year.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free