Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT144 S3 Q11 Explanation

Activist: Accidents at the Three Mile Island

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsEvaluate

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Activist: Accidents at the Three Mile Island and Chernobyl nuclear plants have shown the dangers of nuclear power. It was earlier argued that nuclear power was necessary because fossil fuels will eventually run out. Recently, however, a technology has been developed for deriving from sewage sludge an oil that can be used needs in a way that better protects the environment from harm than we do at present.

What this question is testing

Evaluate

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
11.

Which one of the following considerations is LEAST relevant in evaluating the degree of practicability of the hope expressed

Answer choices

  1. Relevant8% picked this

    whether the current methods of disposing of sewage sludge by dumping

    If the current methods of disposing of sewage sludge by dumping do a lot of environmental damage, then taking that sludge and using it for deriving oil (rather than just dumping it somewhere) should be a net win for the environment. It sounds like we'd be "meeting our energy needs in a way that better protects the environment from harm than we do at present".

  2. Correct71% picked this

    whether the processes that are used to turn sewage into clean water and sewage sludge have been

    Why this is right

    Here, whether we say the processes have been improved in recent decades or haven't (i.e. they're the same as they were 20-30 years go), it makes no difference. The process that takes sewage and separates it out into clean water and sewage sludge doesn't really have anything to do with the activist's hope. If it's been improved, that doesn't necessarily mean anything good for the environment. If it's the same as it's been for decades, that doesn't mean anything. The new thing being discussed is the idea of taking that sewage sludge, once it's been separated from the clean water in sewage, and then deriving an oil from it that can generate power. This answer has nothing to do with our new idea for what we do with sewage sludge. It's only talking about the process that leads to us getting sewage sludge in the first place.

    Skill tested: Evaluate · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Relevant16% picked this

    whether the cost of producing and using oil from sewage sludge would

    It wouldn't be very practical to use sewage sludge as an energy source if the cost of producing and using oil from sewage sludge is not economically sustainable.

  4. Relevant2% picked this

    whether the burning of oil from sewage sludge would, in contrast to nuclear power production, produce gases that would have a harmful

    Ceasing nuclear power and starting to use sewage sludge power might not be a net gain for protecting the environment from harm if sewage sludge led to harmful global warming gases, whereas the nuclear power didn't.

  5. Relevant3% picked this

    whether waste products that would be produced in deriving oil from sewage sludge and burning it would be as dangerous as those produced by

    Ceasing nuclear power and starting to use sewage sludge power might not be a net gain for protecting the environment from harm if sewage sludge led to waste products that are just as dangerous as those nuclear power created.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free