Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT144 S2 Q7 Explanation

Economist: Owing to global economic

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsParadox

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Economist: Owing to global economic forces since 1945, our country's economy is increasingly a service economy, in which manufacturing employs an ever smaller fraction of the workforce. less and less international trade.

What this question is testing

Paradox

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
7.

Which one of the following, if true, would most help to explain the decreasing engagement in international trade

Answer choices

  1. No Distinction5% picked this

    International trade agreements have usually covered both trade in manufactured goods and

    This makes manufacturing / services seem similar in relation to international trade. We need a reason why manufacturing was more associated with international trade, and why a service economy is less associated.

  2. No Distinction2% picked this

    Employment in the service sector tends to require as many specialized skills as does

    Not only does this have no clear tie-in to international trade, but again this makes manufacturing / services seem similar. We're looking for a distinction between them, so that we can explain why the decline of manufacturing and rise of service jobs went along with less and less international trade.

  3. Correct81% picked this

    Because services are usually delivered in person, markets for services tend

    Why this is right

    This provides a distinction between manufacturing and service jobs. It provides a reason why service jobs would be connected to less international trade, since it's saying that service jobs skew local. Service jobs are usually done in person, to the market for them (the people paying for service work) are usually local to the people performing the service. If you have a service job (travel agent / hostess / barista / etc.), you're probably performing that job for people in your country, not in some other country. Meanwhile, if you manufacture coffee grinders, you could have customers all over the world. Thus, as the economy has become less about manufacturing and more about services, there has been less and less international trade. There aren't foreign countries who want to hire us as their personal trainers, gardeners, or housekeepers.

    Skill tested: Paradox · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Explains Background7% picked this

    Many manufacturing jobs have been rendered obsolete by advances in

    This helps to provide context for why the economy is decreasingly manufacturing, but we weren't trying to explain why manufacturing was on the decline. We need to explain why a decline in manufacturing (and surge of service jobs) translates into less international trade. This answer doesn't connect to international trade at all.

  5. Deepens Paradox5% picked this

    Some services can be procured less expensively from providers in other countries than from providers

    This actually discusses times in which there would be international trade, for service jobs. The idea of procuring service jobs from some other country rather than from your own country is connecting service jobs to international trade. But we wanted an answer that helps us see why service jobs are connected to less international trade.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free