Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Easy

PT144 S1 P4 Q22 Explanation

Karl Popper

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsMeaning in ContextScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Passage

Karl Popper’s main contribution to the philosophy of science concerns the power of negative evidence. The fundamental point is simple: No number of white swans, for example, can ever prove that all swans are white, but a single black swan disproves the hypothesis. Popper gives this logical asymmetry between positive and negative a theory counts as scientific only if it makes predictions that are testable in this way.

However, Popper’s use of the logical asymmetry does not adequately capture the actual situation scientists face. If a theory deductively entails a false prediction, then the theory must be false as well. But a scientific theory rarely entails predictions on its own. When scientists actually derive a theory’s predictions, they almost always more than one possible explanation. Positive evidence is never conclusive. But negative evidence rarely is either.

Passage B When the planet Uranus was discovered, astronomers attempted to predict its orbit. They based their predictions on Newton’s laws and auxiliary assumptions about the mass of the sun and the masses, orbits, and velocities of other planets. One of the auxiliary assumptions was that no planets existed in the vicinity precise place it would have to be to bring their calculations into alignment with their observations.

Later astronomers, again using Newton’s laws, predicted the orbit of Mercury. Once again, the predictions were not borne out. They hypothesized the existence of another planet in the vicinity, which they called Vulcan. However, Vulcan was never found, and some scientists began to think that perhaps Newton’s laws were in error. Finally, to the rejection of Newton’s theory of gravity and to increased confidence in Einstein’s theory.

What this question is testing

Meaning in Context

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
22.

In passage B, which one of the following most clearly illustrates a disturbing force, as described in passage

Answer choices

  1. Unrelated to Goal6% picked this

    We're looking for Neptune. Uranus was the thing being studied, the thing being affected by the disturbing force of Neptune.

  2. Unrelated to Goal5% picked this

    the

    We're looking for Neptune. The sun didn't disturb our measurements of Uranus. (Only if you used outside knowledge could you convince yourself that the sun's mass was a disturbing force on Mercury, since Newton's theory of physics doesn't account for the way that massive objects such as the sun warp the shape of spacetime that Mercury travels through. But the passage is using the case of Mercury as an example where the THEORY was wrong, not where one of the underlying assumptions is wrong)

  3. Correct81% picked this

    Why this is right

    Scientists assumed there were no planets around Uranus when they used Newton's theory to predict Uranus' orbit. Their predictions were off because they didn't account for the disturbing force of Neptune's gravity.

    Skill tested: Meaning in Context · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Unrelated to Goal7% picked this

    We're looking for Neptune. Mercury's orbit wasn't affected by any disturbing force; they thought maybe there was a disturbing force they named planet Vulcan, but there wasn't. The scientists' predictions were wrong because Newton's theory was off, and Einstein's was better.

  5. Unrelated to Goal1% picked this

    the

    We're looking for Neptune. The moon wasn't affecting scientists' measurements of Uranus's or Mercury's orbits.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free