Logical Reasoning

PT143 · S3 · Q21 Mate is a beverage found in much

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Maté is a beverage found in much of South America.

Conclusion (therefore)

Paraguay is likely the place where mate originated.

Evidence

There are more varieties of it found in Paraguay than anywhere else, and it is used more widely there than anywhere else.

Evaluate

On a basic Linking level, this argument seems to think,

That, of course, doesn't have to be true. Something could originate in one place / one culture but then REALLY take off in popularity somewhere else.

We could potentially construe this as an Explain the Curious Fact type argument as well.

Curious Fact .. Why do we find more varieties / more usage of mate in Paraguay than anywhere else?

Author's Explanation ... Because that's where mate originated (and so there has been more time for spin-off varieties to develop? more time for it to become a stable of their culture?)

Goal

We want to either rule out an alternate explanation for where mate originated, rule out an alternate explanation for why Paraguay has the most varieties / usage of mate, or boost the plausibility that mate originated in Paraguay.

21.

Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?

  1. It is rare for there

    Weak Impact

    If we apply this principle to the fact that Paraguay is known to have a great variety of types of mate, then it's telling us that "mate has been in use in Paraguay for a very long time". That somewhat strengthens, but "very long time" doesn't have a strong connection to "this is where it started", unless we know that the other places where mate exists have not had it for a very long time. But we don't know that. Given that mate is found in much of South America, it's probably been in use in lots of countries for a very long time, so this isn't doing much to distinguish Paraguay from other countries, in terms of making Paraguay the most likely suspect for where mate started. And the other countries where mate is found might also have a great variety of types of mate. This Absolute language (do they or don't they have a great variety of types) doesn't connect with the evidence, which was Relative language (however many types of mate everyone has, Paraguay has more types).

    32% picked this

  2. Many Paraguayans believe that mate

    Weakens Slightly

    This actually suggests that people from countries besides Paraguay brought mate to Paraguay. If a certain thing wasn't popular until a bunch of immigrants came to a country, then it's reasonable to guess that this new thing was due to the influence of those immigrants. It's possible that native Paraguayans invented mate to welcome their new immigrants; but it's at least as possible that migrating outsiders introduced Paraguay to mate, which actually originated in their homeland.

    4% picked this

  3. Many Paraguayans believe that the

    Very Weak Impact

    This is a very weak claim, since "many Paraguayans" could mean like 5 or 10 people. It might be the 5 or 10 Paraguayans who own a mate shop, who are saying, "Ours is the best". Beyond being weak, is there a common sense connection that "the best version of X is where X originated"? Somewhat, but not too strong a connection. There might be some award winning sushi restaurant in New York City that many believe is the best sushi, but that doesn't mean we think that sushi originated in NYC.

    0% picked this

  4. There are few places outside

    No Impact

    This does nothing to help us assess whether mate originated in Paraguay vs. in one of the other South American countries where mate is popular.

    5% picked this

  5. Correct

    Typically, the longer a beverage

    Why this is right

    This adds some plausibility to the link the author was assuming between "used more widely in Paraguay" and "originated in Paraguay". It is similar to (A), in the sense that it's connecting one of the two premises (more varieties / more widely used) to the idea of how long it's been in use. However, (A) used Absolute language: if you have a great number of varieties of X, then you've probably had X for a long time. This kind of language could apply to a lot of South American countries in the same way, and thus it wouldn't help us give the edge to Paraguay. (E) uses Relative language: if X is more widely used, then you've had X for longer. The relative language matches what he heard in the premise, and because of the Volume Dial nature of the answer, it's suggesting that if Paraguay is #1 when it comes to widely used then it's #1 when it comes to how long mate has been in use. The country where mate has been in use the longest is presumably where mate originated, so the more we make Paraguay sound like the country where mate has been in use the longest, the more we're strengthening the conclusion. This answer does not definitively establish that Paraguay is the place where mate has been used the longest (the connection described is only what's typically true), but this answer still does more than any other answer to add some plausibility. ** Only keep reading for nerdy Volume Dial discussion ** A lot of us are bothered by the fact that the Volume Dial relationship in this answer is written backwards. These relationships are invertible but not reversible: the higher the volume setting, the louder the music the lower the volume setting, the softer the music But going backwards seems dicey. Just because the music got louder doesn't mean that someone raised the volume setting. Maybe they just moved the speaker closer to my ear. Maybe there was a towel covering up the speaker and they removed it. This answer would be much stronger if it were written: the more widely used something is, the longer it's been somewhere But a conditional or a volume dial relationship can still add some plausibility, even if it's in "backwards" form. Say we have a theory that Erika has a crush on Mark. She's been looking at her phone a lot, waiting for a text from him. (naturally there could be other explanations for why she's compulsively looking to see if he's texted) However, hearing "When Erika has a crush on somebody, the anxiously awaits texts from them" still adds some plausibility to our theory, even though structurally it's in an 'illegal' form of "If Conclusion, then Premise". In the world of Strengthen and Weaken, we're not dealing with perfectly proving (or refuting) conclusions. It's more about plausibility and innuendo. If a theory predicts X and X is true, that doesn't automatically mean the theory is right, but it strengthens the credibility of that theory. The author has the theory that mate originated in Paraguay (i.e. that it's been in use there the longest). This answer assigns a prediction to that theory: if it's been in Paraguay the longest, then we'd expect to find it more widely used there than anywhere else. Since that matches our observation, it strengthens the author's theory.

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

    58% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free