Logical Reasoning

PT143 · S1 · Q20 Researchers compared the brains

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Researchers compared the brains of recently deceased people who had schizophrenia with those of recently deceased people who did not have schizophrenia.

Information

math-y / contrast

35% of the recently dead people who had schizophrenia had damage to subplate (a structure of nerve cells).

0% of the recently dead people who didn’t have schizophrenia had damage to subplate.

causal The damage must have occurred prior to the 2nd fetal trimester.

During that period, the development of the connections between different parts of the brain are controlled by the subplate.

Evaluate

The fact that the paragraph starts by establishing a weird difference that is only found in the brains of the schizophrenics should pique our curiosity: what does it mean that 35% of schizophrenics had damage to this subplate but none of the brains without schizophrenia had it?

The last two ideas make it seem like if you had a damaged subplate prior to the 2nd fetal trimester, it could mess up the development of connections between the different parts of the brain.

Since outside knowledge of schizophrenia tells us that such patients often seem to have “multiple personalities”, you wonder whether this paragraph is trying to make us speculate that schizophrenia is caused (in some cases) by damage to the subplate, resulting in a disconnected brain.

Goal

It seems hard to guess exactly where this one is going, so let’s look for the most supportable answer, being wary of answers that are Too Strong, make an Unsupported Comparison, or bring up something Out of Scope.

20.

Which one of the following conclusions is most strongly supported by the information above?

  1. Roughly 35 percent of people

    Too Strong: roughly 35%

    This is a classic trap answer in spot (A) on an Inference question. When they think that they have provoked a guess out of us (they provoked me to guess that this was heading towards the idea that bad subplate —leads to—> some cases of schizophrenia), they love to put a broken version of that in spot (A). It’s too strong and literal to say that 35% of people with bad subplates will eventually get schizophrenia. We’d have more support for saying 35% of people with schizophrenia got from bad subplates. But we'd rather soften it even more, because we're being pretty speculative about drawing this causal inference to begin with.

    2% picked this

  2. A promising treatment in some

    Out of Scope: promising treatment

    This is not only assuming that schizophrenia is caused by damaged connections in the brain but also assuming that a treatment exists that can reverse it. We don’t have any support for any sort of treatment that not exists.

    5% picked this

  3. Some people developed schizophrenia because

    Before vs. After 2nd Trimester

    This is lovably soft and fits the causal gist of the paragraph, but we were told that the damage occurred prior to the 2nd fetal trimester (i.e. during the 1st trimester, the first three months of being pregnant). This answer says the damage occurred after the 2nd fetal trimester (i.e. during the 3rd trimester, the last three months of being pregnant).

    12% picked this

  4. Schizophrenia is determined by genetic

    Too Strong

    Too Strong: determined by Out of Scope: genetic factors We’re only getting a picture here that schizophrenia (in 35% of cases) might be caused by damage to a part of the brain in a 1st trimester fetus. We have no idea if this damage was caused by genetic factors, and it would also be too strong to assume that all cases of schizophrenia are caused by this same subplate damage.

    1% picked this

  5. Correct

    There may be a cause

    Why this is right

    This is lovably weak (there may be a cause). This gets at the same sentiment that (A) and (C) were, but it avoids saying anything too strong, and it doesn’t mess up the 2nd trimester thing. The passage suggests that some of these schizophrenics had damage to their subplate during the 1st trimester (which predates birth, of course).

    Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

    80% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free