Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT143 S1 Q20 Explanation

Researchers compared the brains

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMost Supported

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Researchers compared the brains of recently deceased people who had schizophrenia with those of recently deceased people who did not have schizophrenia. They found that 35 percent of the former and none of the latter showed evidence of damage to a structure of nerve cells called the subplate. They knew that this the development of the connections between the different parts of the brain.

What this question is testing

Most Supported

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
20.

Which one of the following conclusions is most strongly supported by the

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong: roughly 35%2% picked this

    Roughly 35 percent of people with abnormal brain subplates will eventually

    This is a classic trap answer in spot (A) on an Inference question. When they think that they have provoked a guess out of us (they provoked me to guess that this was heading towards the idea that bad subplate —leads to—> some cases of schizophrenia), they love to put a broken version of that in spot (A). It’s too strong and literal to say that 35% of people with bad subplates will eventually get schizophrenia. We’d have more support for saying 35% of people with schizophrenia got from bad subplates. But we'd rather soften it even more, because we're being pretty speculative about drawing this causal inference to begin with.

  2. Out of Scope: promising treatment5% picked this

    A promising treatment in some cases of schizophrenia is repair of the damaged connections between the different

    This is not only assuming that schizophrenia is caused by damaged connections in the brain but also assuming that a treatment exists that can reverse it. We don’t have any support for any sort of treatment that not exists.

  3. Before vs. After 2nd Trimester12% picked this

    Some people developed schizophrenia because of damage to the brain subplate after the

    This is lovably soft and fits the causal gist of the paragraph, but we were told that the damage occurred prior to the 2nd fetal trimester (i.e. during the 1st trimester, the first three months of being pregnant). This answer says the damage occurred after the 2nd fetal trimester (i.e. during the 3rd trimester, the last three months of being pregnant).

  4. Too Strong2% picked this

    Schizophrenia is determined by genetic

    Too Strong: determined by Out of Scope: genetic factors We’re only getting a picture here that schizophrenia (in 35% of cases) might be caused by damage to a part of the brain in a 1st trimester fetus. We have no idea if this damage was caused by genetic factors, and it would also be too strong to assume that all cases of schizophrenia are caused by this same subplate damage.

  5. Correct79% picked this

    There may be a cause of schizophrenia that

    Why this is right

    This is lovably weak (there may be a cause). This gets at the same sentiment that (A) and (C) were, but it avoids saying anything too strong, and it doesn’t mess up the 2nd trimester thing. The passage suggests that some of these schizophrenics had damage to their subplate during the 1st trimester (which predates birth, of course).

    Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free