Reading Comprehension

PT142 · S3 · P1 · Q7 The Decline of Perfumery

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Given the amount of time and effort that curators, collectors, dealers, scholars, and critics spend on formulating judgments of taste in relation to oil paintings, it seems odd that so few are prepared to apply some of the same skills in exploring works of art that stimulate another sense altogether: that of smell.

Topic

Why great perfume isn’t considered a serious art form—despite strong similarities to painting and music.

Framework

Challenge Position (The author challenges the position that perfume is not taken seriously as art.)

Main Point

Even though perfume, like painting and music, is a sophisticated art that stimulates our senses and emotions, it isn’t taken as seriously as visual or musical arts, partly due to commercialization and neglect by art professionals. *Most Valuable Sentence*: "Why is great perfume not taken more seriously?" (end of P1 and developed throughout passage) and (P3).

P1: Surprise at Perfume’s Neglect by Art Professionals

Despite how much time experts spend evaluating visual arts, almost nobody in the art world approaches perfume with the same seriousness, even though some perfumes are true masterpieces.

P2: Comparing Painting and Perfumery Techniques

The passage draws parallels between painting and perfume-making, describing how both involve crafting complex creations from natural and synthetic materials, with both changing over time.

P3: Perfume as a Sophisticated, Emotional Art

Just as painters create moods and stories with color, skilled perfumers (“noses”) use scents to evoke deep emotional memories and experiences—making perfume as intimate and powerful as painting or music.

7.

The last paragraph most strongly supports which one of the following statements?

  1. The names of the world's

    Too Strong: most

    Nothing in the last paragraph says what most (51% or more) of consumers know / believe / think.

    1% picked this

  2. Correct

    The profitability of a particular

    Why this is right

    The last sentence of the passage is decent support for this. Fine perfume (high quality perfume) is hopelessly entangled with the international cosmetic dollar (profitability). But it's also supported by the 2nd sentence in this last paragraph -- "the substitution of cheap compounds that approximately resemble rarer, better ingredients in an effort to increase profits". This is saying that quality goes down, while profit goes up. Thus, a highly profitable perfume would not necessarily be a high quality perfume. (If you were thinking, "wait, isn't profitability a good indicator, since it has an inverse relationship with quality?", that would just be too extreme a reading of what the author is talking about. He isn't generalizing that dramatically. He's saying some companies are swapping more profitable ingredients for higher quality ingredients, and that fine perfume is entangled with cosmetic dollars. So it's messy. It's not a straightforward relationship between high quality is most profitable)

    Skill tested: Inference · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    89% picked this

  3. Companies that sell perfume pay

    Too Strong: pay little attention

    The only mention this paragraph makes about customers is that companies that use cheap chemical compounds to replace rarer, better ingredients don't tell their customers about this switch and presume their customers won't notice the difference The decision not to tell customers about switching out ingredients for an inferior substitute doesn't necessarily mean that companies pay little attention to what customers want. It could easily be a reflection of the opposite. Companies do pay attention and know customers want highly refined perfumes, and that's why the companies don't announce when they're swapping out something better for something cheaper.

    5% picked this

  4. Perfume makers of the past

    Too Strong: never

    All we know is that the current profit-driven corporations do not hesitate to tamper with old formulas. This is trying bait people into thinking, "whatever we didn't mention was the opposite way". It certainly feels like the author is describing a growing trend in which perfumers tolerate tinkering with old formulas, but we don't have anything that supports the extreme claim that in the past they would never tamper with an old formula.

    3% picked this

  5. Companies that sell perfume make

    Too Strong: most / least expensive

    This last paragraph doesn't get specific enough for us to derive the idea that more than 51% of profits comes from the lowest tier of perfume prices.

    2% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free