Logical Reasoning

PT142 · S2 · Q7 Talbert: Chess is beneficial for

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Talbert: Chess is beneficial for school-age children.

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

7.

Talbert's and Sklar's statements provide the strongest support for holding that they disagree with each other over whether

  1. chess promotes mental maturity

    Unsupported Disagree Position

    Although it's clear that Person 1 believes this, we can't well support that Person 2 believes that "chess does not promote mental maturity". Our only support would be "chess has no societal value", which isn't nothing, but it's easier with the correct answer to support the Agree and Disagree positions.

    5% picked this

  2. many activities promote mental maturity

    Out of Scope

    Out of Scope: other activities Unsupported Comparison: just as well We wouldn't be able to extract this idea from either paragraph. No one is comparing how well chess promotes mental maturity to how well other activities do.

    2% picked this

  3. chess is socially valuable and

    Unsupported Agree Position

    We know that Person 2 thinks that science is valuable. But we couldn't derive from Person 1 that science is not valuable.

    3% picked this

  4. Correct

    children should be taught to

    Why this is right

    Person 1 seems to believe this (it's beneficial and has all these positives), while Person 2 seems to think children should not be taught to play chess (it has no societal value and diverts attention from things that do).

    Skill tested: Agree/Disagree · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

    91% picked this

  5. children who neither play chess

    Out of Scope

    We never talk about kids who don't play chess and don't study science.

    0% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free