Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT142 S2 Q12 Explanation

Shark teeth are among the most

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsParadox

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Shark teeth are among the most common vertebrate fossils; yet fossilized shark skeletons are much less common—indeed, fossilized vertebrate skeletons.

What this question is testing

Paradox

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
12.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent

Answer choices

  1. Correct89% picked this

    Unlike the bony skeletons of other vertebrates, shark skeletons are composed of cartilage, and teeth and bone are much more likely

    Why this is right

    This explains why shark teeth are more common than than shark skeletons. Shark skeletons are composed of cartilage and cartilage is much less likely to fossilize than teeth and bone.

    Skill tested: Paradox · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Too Weak2% picked this

    The rare fossilized skeletons of sharks that are found are often found in areas other than those in which fossils

    That shark skeletons are found in different areas than shark teeth does not explain why they are found less often than shark teeth.

  3. Too Weak1% picked this

    Fossils of sharks' teeth are quite difficult to distinguish from fossils of other

    For this to explain the abundance of shark teeth relative to shark skeletons it would need to be assumed that other kinds of teeth are misidentified as shark teeth. If shark teeth were misidentified as other kinds of teeth, then the apparent paradox would be deepened for the abundance of shark teeth relative to shark skeletons would be even greater than is now understood.

  4. Too Weak7% picked this

    Some species of sharks alive today grow and lose many sets of teeth

    This is about some species of shark alive today, while the apparent paradox centers on fossilized shark teeth and skeletons. Without knowing that these sharks that grow and lose many sets of teeth existed in the past, this cannot explain the fossil record.

  5. Too Weak0% picked this

    The physical and chemical processes involved in the fossilization of sharks' teeth are as common as those involved in

    This does not necessarily explain why there are more fossilized shark teeth than skeletons, since it does not make those conditions that fossilize teeth more common.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free