Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT141 S4 Q23 Explanation

Problem: If Shayna congratulates

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsPrinciple-Conform

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Problem: If Shayna congratulates Daniel on his award, she will misrepresent her true feelings. However, if Shayna does not hurt his feelings.

Principle: One should never be insincere about one's feelings, except possibly where one believes that the person with whom one kindness to honesty.

What this question is testing

Principle-Conform

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
23.

The principle, if valid, most helps to justify the reasoning in which one of the following arguments

Answer choices

  1. Bad Conclusion Match10% picked this

    If Shayna congratulates Daniel, she will avoid hurting his feelings, so she

    This argument is saying that she should congratulate, which means she should be insincere. This principle has no power to prove should be insincere, only shouldn't be insincere (since you can only prove the idea on the right side of the principle).

  2. Bad Outcome Match / Bad Trigger Match43% picked this

    Daniel might prefer for Shayna to congratulate him—even if insincerely—rather than for her to express her true feelings, and so Shayna would be doing

    This argument is saying that she would be doing nothing wrong by congratulating, but this principle only has the power to prove that Shayna would be doing something wrong by congratulating, since we can only conclude the right side of the principle. Additionally, this doesn't establish that Shanya believes that Daniel prefers kindness to honesty; it just informs us that Daniel might prefer kindness to honesty in this situation. The rule is based on a belief about another person's preference, not about their actual preference.

  3. Bad Premise/Conclusion Match10% picked this

    Shayna believes that kindness should be preferred to dishonesty when speaking to others, so she should not tell

    We don't care whether Shayna prefers kindness to honesty. The principle cares about whether she believes the person with whom she's speaking (Daniel) prefers kindness to honesty. And the conclusion is saying "she should not tell her true feelings", which is drifting towards "she should lie / be insincere". Our principle only allows us to conclude that you shouldn't be insincere, that you should tell your true feelings.

  4. Bad Premise Match9% picked this

    Daniel's feelings would be hurt if he knew that congratulations from Shayna were insincere, so Shayna

    This does conclude what the principle has the power to prove: don't be insincere, so don't congratulate him. But the basis for this conclusion doesn't match the trigger of the principle -- it says nothing about whether Shayna believes that Daniel prefers kindness to honesty.

  5. Correct28% picked this

    Shayna has no opinion about whether Daniel would prefer kindness to honesty, so she should

    Why this is right

    This establishes the trigger of the principle: - it is not the case that Shayna believes Daniel prefers kindness to honesty (she has no opinion on the matter) And it concludes the outcome of the principle: - she should not be insincere; thus, she shouldn't congratulate Daniel.

    Skill tested: Principle-Conform · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free