Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT141 S3 P3 Q18 Explanation

Happiness and Wealth

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsLocal PurposeSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Passage A Research concerning happiness and wealth reveals a paradox: at any one time richer people report higher levels of happiness than poorer people in the same society report, and yet over time advanced societies have not grown happier as they have grown richer. Apparently, people are comparing their income with with actual income. Two phenomena—habituation and rivalry—push up the norm.

When our living standards increase, we love it initially but then we adjust and it makes little difference. For example, if we ask people with different incomes what income they consider sufficient, the “required income” correlates strongly with their actual income: a rise in actual income causes a roughly equivalent rise in on the absolute level of wages but rises if wages rapidly increase.

We do not have the same experience with other aspects of our lives. We do not foresee how we adjust to material possessions, so we the expense of leisure.

Now consider the phenomenon of rivalry. In a study conducted by Solnick and Hemenway, people were asked to choose between prices held constant:

A. You earn $50,000 a year while everyone $25,000;

B. You earn $100,000 a year while others

The majority chose the first. They were happy to be poorer, provided position improved.

And indeed, how people compare to their “reference group”—those most like them—is crucial for happiness. In East Germany, for example, living standards have soared since 1990, but the level of happiness has plummeted because people now than with people in other Soviet bloc countries.

Passage B Does the Solnick and Hemenway study mean that we care most about one-upmanship? Perhaps out of our primeval past comes the urge to demonstrate our superiority in order to help ensure mating prospects, keeping our genetic lines going. Still from having a bigger house than our neighbors.

This theory may sound good and is commonly heard, but it is not the explanation best supported by the evidence. Rather, the data show that earning more makes people happier because relative prosperity successful, that they have created value.

If two people feel equally successful, they will be equally happy even if their incomes differ greatly. Of course, people who earn more generally view themselves as successful. But it is the success—not the money per se—that provides the happiness. We use material wealth but that we are prosperous because we create value.

What scholars often portray as an ignoble tendency—wanting to have more than others—is really evidence of a desire to create value. Wanting to create value benefits that it also brings happiness.

What this question is testing

Local Purpose

Your task

Identify why the author included the referenced detail at that point in the passage — its function, not its content.

Common trap

Answers that merely repeat or summarize the topic of the detail instead of describing the role it plays.

Winning move

Ask what job the detail does for the paragraph, then for the passage's broader point.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
18.

Which one of the following pairs most accurately describes why the authors of passage A and passage B, respectively, mention the study

Answer choices

  1. Bad Matches3% picked this

    to present a view that will be

    to present a view for which additional evidence will

    Passage A brings up S&H to help support their main point, not to argue against a view. This first description makes more sense for Passage B. Passage B isn't providing additional evidence for a view related to S&H. It is countering that view by offering an alternative explanation for which there is stronger evidence.

  2. Bad Match for Passage A6% picked this

    to present a view that will be

    to provide evidence for one explanation of

    Same as (A), Passage A brings up S&H to help support their main point, not to argue against a view. This first description makes more sense for Passage B.

  3. Bad Match for Passage B15% picked this

    to provide evidence for one explanation of

    to present a view for which additional evidence will

    Passage B isn't providing additional evidence for a view related to S&H. It is countering that view by offering an alternative explanation for which there is stronger evidence.

  4. Correct55% picked this

    to provide evidence for one explanation of

    to introduce the main topic to

    Why this is right

    Passage A brings up S&H to help support one half of the main point. The main point is that people can be richer but feel less happy because of habituation and rivalry. The discussion of the S&H study is there to explain to us how rivalry can impact our perceived happiness. Passage B opens the passage with S&H, so it makes sense to say that it's there to introduce the main topic. The common interpretation of the S&H study is the main topic. The 2nd paragraph shows that our author's purpose in writing about this common interpretation is to challenge it and suggest that an alternate interpretation is better supported.

    Skill tested: Local Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Bad Match for Passage A21% picked this

    to introduce the main topic to

    to present a view that will be

    The main topic of passage A is not the S&H study. The S&H study is there to flesh out the idea of how rivalry can impact our perception of happiness. But the main topic is that people are comparing their income to some rising norm (via habituation and rivalry), and that's why over time advanced societies haven't grown happier as they've grown richer.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free