Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT141 S3 P2 Q14 Explanation

Katherine Dunham

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsAuthor OpinionHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

One of the more striking developments in modern North American dance was African American choreographer Katherine Dunham’s introduction of a technique known as dance-isolation, in which one part of the body moves in one rhythm while other parts are kept stationary or are moved in different rhythms. The incorporation of this technique dance is due in no small part to her training in both anthropological research and choreography.

As an anthropologist in the 1930s, Dunham was one of the pioneers in the field of dance ethnology. Previously, dance had been neglected as an area of social research, primarily because most social scientists gravitated toward areas likely to be recognized by their peers as befitting scientifically rigorous, and therefore legitimate, modes while experts in dance were not trained in the methods of social research.

Starting in 1935, Dunham conducted a series of research projects into traditional Caribbean dance forms, with special interest in their origins in African culture. Especially critical to her success was her approach to research, which diverged radically from the methodology that prevailed at the time. Colleagues in anthropology advised her not to techniques well enough to teach them to others and incorporate them into new forms of ballet.

Between 1937 and 1945, Dunham developed a research-to-performance method that she used to adapt Caribbean dance forms for use in theatrical performance, combining them with modern dance styles she learned in Chicago. The ballets she created in this fashion were among the first North American dances to rectify the exclusion of African own right, making possible future companies such as Arthur Mitchell’s Dance Theater of Harlem.

What this question is testing

Author Opinion

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
14.

The passage suggests that the author would be most likely to agree with which one of the following statements about the colleagues

Answer choices

  1. Out of Scope: injury5% picked this

    They were partly correct in recommending that Dunham change her methods of data collection, since injury sustained during fieldwork

    The author never indicated he was worried about injury. The author indicates that the colleagues were worried about two things: 1. dancing is too physically demanding 2. dancing would ruin your scientific detachment The author makes a point of saying #2 is not a great reason to refrain. But that doesn't mean that by omission our author is saying that #1 is a good reason to refrain. Also "physically demanding" is just exhausting, it doesn't have to include or connote the idea of "injury".

  2. Unsupported / Violates Common Sense3% picked this

    They were partly correct in advising Dunham to exercise initial caution in participating in the Caribbean dances, since her skill in

    Again, even though the author didn't make an editorial objection against "the physical demands of the dance" being a reason to refrain from participating, that doesn't give us positive support that the author thinks that "the physical demands" was a good reason to refrain. This answer is almost internally incoherent --- "You guys were right to warn her against joining in the dance, since her skill in performing the dances improved with experience (doing the dances". Huh? How could we be saying "it was wise to refrain from doing the dance until you had done the dance enough to build up your skill at performing it"? That sounds like an internal contradiction: wait until you've participated enough to improve from experience before you start to participate.

  3. Too Strong: extensive / generally39% picked this

    They were incorrect in advising Dunham to increase the degree of her detachment, since extensive personal investment in

    The author would agree with the first half of this answer, because he thinks that "maintaining detachment" was not a compelling reason to refrain from dancing. But ... we don't know if our author is making an exception for this type of case where the thing being studied involves physical, collective movement. Maybe the author would still say that "extensive personal investment in fieldwork generally threatens scientific rigor, but in the case of Dunham it seemed like a worthwhile learning experience to be personally invested enough to physically learn the dance." The "extensive investment + generally enhances rigor" is what's killing this answer. Our author would sign off on "some investment does not necessarily diminish rigor"

  4. Correct46% picked this

    They were incorrect in assuming that researchers in the social sciences are able to gather data in

    Why this is right

    This is pulling from the line we expected: fortunately recognized as unrealistic The author was referring to the long-standing view that effective data gathering can and must be conducted from a position of complete detachment. If you say, thank goodness we've finally recognized that it's unrealistic to think that "effective data gathering can be conducted from a position of complete detachment", you're saying, thank goodness people finally realize you can't ever really come from a position of complete detachment.

    Skill tested: Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Out of Scope7% picked this

    They were incorrect in assuming that dance could be studied with the same degree of scientific rigor possible

    Out of Scope: other areas of ethnology Out of the Support Window These "colleagues" who appear in the middle of the third paragraph never say anything about other areas of ethnology. This answer is grabbing language from outside the Support Window. The idea of how rigorous something like dance research could be is covered in the 2nd paragraph.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free