Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT141 S3 P1 Q4 Explanation

Prions

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsInferenceScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

An organism is considered to have an infection when a disease-causing agent, called a pathogen, establishes a viable presence in the organism. This can occur only if the pathogenic agent is able to reproduce itself in the host organism. The only agents believed until recently to be responsible for infections—viruses, bacteria, fungi, thus widely assumed that all pathogens contain such genetic material in their cellular structure.

This assumption has been challenged, however, by scientists seeking to identify the pathogen that causes Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD), a degenerative form of dementia in humans. CJD causes the brain to become riddled with tiny holes, like a sponge (evidence of extensive nerve cell death). Its symptoms include impaired muscle control, loss of not exclusively, of protein. Researchers coined the term “prion” for this new type of protein pathogen.

Upon further study, scientists discovered that prions normally exist as harmless cellular proteins in many of the body’s tissues, including white blood cells and nerve cells in the brain; however, they possess the capability of converting their structures into a dangerous abnormal shape. Prions exhibiting this abnormal conformation were found to have though there are wide variations in pre-symptomatic incubation times and in how aggressively the disease progresses.

Although the discovery of the link between prions and CJD was initially received with great skepticism in the scientific community, subsequent research has supported the conclusion that prions are an entirely new class of infectious pathogens. Furthermore, it is now believed that a similar process of protein malformation may be involved in which prions reproduce themselves and cause cellular destruction have yet to be completely understood.

What this question is testing

Inference

Anticipate

This is a Most Strongly Supported question. P3 spells out how prions cause CJD: an abnormal prion converts the next one it touches, that converts the next, and so on — a chain reaction that produces destructive plaques. The whole damage mechanism depends on this self-reproduction. So if abnormal prions couldn't reproduce themselves, the cascade wouldn't happen and CJD wouldn't result.

Goal

Looking for an answer that follows from the mechanism in P3. Be wary of:

Claims about specific transmission routes (injection only, etc.) the passage doesn't support

Claims that other diseases are caused by the same agent

Comparisons of progression rates across diseases

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
4.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported by

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong2% picked this

    The only way in which CJD can be transmitted is through the injection of abnormally shaped prions from an infected

    The passage doesn't restrict CJD transmission to injection of abnormal prions; it doesn't describe transmission routes between individuals at all. The "only way" framing is far stronger than anything the passage supports.

  2. Too Strong8% picked this

    Most infectious diseases previously thought to be caused by other pathogens are now thought to

    The passage discusses prions as a new class of pathogen and notes a possible link to Alzheimer's and Parkinson's, but never claims that most infectious diseases previously attributed to other pathogens are now thought to be caused by prions. That dramatic generalization isn't in the passage.

  3. Correct68% picked this

    If they were unable to reproduce themselves, abnormally shaped prions would

    Why this is right

    P3 says CJD damage comes from a chain reaction in which abnormal prions reproduce themselves by converting normal prions on contact. P3 also says CJD is fatal in the absence of any therapy that prevents this cascade. So if abnormal prions couldn't reproduce, the cascade wouldn't occur and CJD wouldn't result. That is exactly what (C) says.

    Skill tested: Inference · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Too Strong13% picked this

    Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease are caused by different conformations of the same pathogen

    The passage says only that "a similar process of protein malformation may be involved" in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's — and that the mechanisms haven't been fully explored. The careful "may be involved in a similar process" is a long way from "caused by different conformations of the same pathogen."

  5. Unsupported8% picked this

    Prion diseases generally progress more aggressively than diseases caused by other

    The passage doesn't compare progression rates of prion diseases against other infectious diseases. It does describe wide variation in CJD progression among patients, but that's a within-disease comparison, not a cross-disease comparison.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free