Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT141 S2 Q23 Explanation

A developing country can substantially

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMost Supported

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

A developing country can substantially increase its economic growth if its businesspeople are willing to invest in modern industries that have not yet been pursued there. But being the first to invest in an industry is very risky. Moreover, businesspeople have little incentive to take this risk since if the same industry, and the competition will cut into their profits.

What this question is testing

Most Supported

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
23.

The statements above, if true, most strongly support which one of the

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong: will not contribute6% picked this

    Once a developing country has at least one business in a modern industry, further investment in that industry will not contribute

    This sounds way more harsh than anything we read: As soon as a developing country has one business entering [the solar power industry], investing any more in [solar power] would not contribute to economic growth? That's crazy strong. Maybe it wouldn't contribute to substantial increases in growth, but not contribute at all?

  2. Out of Scope: greater competition9% picked this

    In developing countries, there is greater competition within modern industries than

    This introduces an unknown comparison between modern and traditional industries. We were told that if a new modern industry succeeds, there will potentially be competing investors in that modern industry. But we were told nothing about competition within traditional industries, so we have no means to make any comparison.

  3. Correct71% picked this

    A developing country can increase its prospects for economic growth by providing added incentive for investment in modern industries that have

    Why this is right

    This Reconciles the Pivot, balancing the idea that developing countries would benefit economically from investment in 'new' modern industries, but investors will see that investment as unpalatably risky. For investors, the risk seems to outweigh the incentive. The investment in a previously un-pursued modern industry is "very risky", while there is "little incentive" to do it. So it's supportable to say that if a developing country can tip the scales a little bit more by adding more incentive for investment in these new modern industries, then more investors might be willing to take on the risk (and if they succeed, it would help the developing country's economic growth). It feels weird to be bringing in this new idea of the developing country adding incentive, but it seems like a plausible takeaway given what we were told about the current imbalance between risk and reward.

    Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Too Strong: will not / unless8% picked this

    A developing country will not experience economic growth unless its businesspeople invest

    The first sentence is saying that a developing country can experience growth from investment in modern industries, but this answer choice is acting like it said that a developing country can only experience growth from investment in modern industries.

  5. Too Strong6% picked this

    Investments in a modern industry in a developing country carry little risk as long as the country has at least one

    Too Strong: little risk Out of Scope: established industries This answer is essentially selling us an "illegal light switch" idea. Because the passage told us that "within new industries that no one's yet pursued, investment is very risky", it's acting like we can infer that "within industries where at least one has pursued, investment carries little risk". We don't know anything from this paragraph about industries that already have at least one established business. And it's possible that investments in them are also very risky, but the potential incentives are so high that investors are willing to take on those risks.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free