Reading Comprehension

PT141 · S1 · P4 · Q25 Rectification of Past Property Injustice

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Passage A

Topic

Justice in property ownership and how it relates to Native American land claims in the U.S.

Framework

Answer / Explain (Passage A gives us a theory for evaluating property justice, and Passage B applies this framework to a real-world historical issue.)

Main Point

Passage A: A just system of property ownership depends on fair acquisition and transfer, and when past injustices occur, those injustices should be rectified by bringing current ownership into line with what would have happened if justice had always been followed. (Most valuable sentence: End of Passage A.) Passage B: The U.S. has a law (the Indian Nonintercourse Act) meant to protect Native American land, and a strong case can be made that, since Native Americans were wrongfully dispossessed, justice requires restoring land to them whenever possible.

P1 (Passage A): Principles of Justice in Property

This paragraph introduces two rules for justice regarding property: one about how you can initially own something, and one about how you can justly transfer it to someone else.

P2 (Passage A): Ideal Entitlement to Property

If everything was fair, ownership would only ever come from original acquisition or fair transfers—no other way would be legitimate.

P3 (Passage A): The Problem of Past Injustice

But real life isn’t so clean: sometimes property is stolen or taken unjustly. Here the author says we need a principle for rectifying this: by looking at history and figuring out what ownership would look like if no injustice had occurred, we should try to correct things now.

25.

Based on what can be inferred from their titles, the relationship between which one of the following pairs of documents is most analogous to the relationship between passage A and passage B?

  1. "Card Counting for Everyone: A

    "The Evils of Gambling"

    Specific vs. General is Reversed

    Passage A's title isn't amazing, but discussing "a system" aligns with Passage A's system of property justice well enough. But in this pair of titles, Passage B has a broader topic. Passage A is focused on one small tidbit of gambling: trying to count cards to beat the dealer in blackjack. Passage B is focused on gambling as a whole. We want the opposite sort of relationship. We think A's title should reflect a more general focus than B's.

    7% picked this

  2. "Mayor McConnell Is Unfit to

    "Why Mayor McConnell Should be

    Equal Specificity / Too Adversarial

    This doesn't scratch our itch from General vs. Specific, because these are equally specific. And since these two titles really indicate a point / counterpoint relationship, they make it seem like Passage A and B were opposed to each other's main points, which seems far off. Both A and B seemed to recognize past injustices in relation to property and to desire a rectification of that injustice.

    2% picked this

  3. "Pruning Fruit Trees: A Guide

    "Easy Recipes for Beginning Cooks"

    Unclear Relationship

    What is the relationship between these two titles? They both kind of relate to food? How to prune a tree is gardening advice. Easy recipes is cooking advice. So these two titles seem to have very little topic overlap, whereas the passage had rectification of property injustice as a pretty specific overlap. If A's title is "A Guide to Pruning Fruit Trees", then B's title should be something like, "How We Should Prune the Orange Tree in the Town Square".

    3% picked this

  4. "Notable Failures of the STORM

    "Meteorologists' Best Tool Yet: The

    Equal Specificity / Too Adversarial

    This doesn't scratch our itch from General vs. Specific, because these are equally specific. They are both about the STORM model. And since these two titles indicate a point / counterpoint relationship (notable failures vs. best tool), they make it seem like Passage A and B were opposed to each other's main points, which seems far off. Both A and B seemed to recognize past injustices in relation to property and to desire a rectification of that injustice.

    4% picked this

  5. Correct

    "Fundamentals of Building Construction and

    "Engineering Report: The Repairs Needed

    Why this is right

    This captures the General vs. Specific relationship of A vs. B. Both A and B dealt with rectification of past property injustice. Both of these titles deal with building repair. Passage A laid out the general principles regarding property justice, and A's title here sounds like it lays out the general principles regarding building construction and repair. Passage B dealt with a specific situation that invokes principles regarding property justice, and B's title here sound like it applies general principles of building repair to a specific situation/building.

    Skill tested: Analogy · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    85% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free