Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT141 S1 P2 Q14 Explanation

Julia Margaret Cameron

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsLocal PurposeHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

From a critical discussion of the work of Victorian photographer Cameron.

What Cameron called her “fancy-subject” pictures—photographs in which two or more costumed sitters enacted, under Cameron’s direction, scenes from the Bible, mythology, Shakespeare, or Tennyson—bear unmistakable traces of the often comical conditions under which they were taken. In many respects they have more connection to the family album pictures of recalcitrant relatives Oscar Gustave Rejlander’s extravagantly awful The Two Ways of Life—rather than among its most vital images.

It is precisely the camera’s realism—its stubborn obsession with the surface of things—that has given Cameron’s theatricality and artificiality its atmosphere of truth. It is the truth of the sitting, rather than the fiction which all the dressing up was in aid of, that wafts out of these wonderful and strange, not-quite-in-focus only Lear or Medea. Still photographs of theatrical scenes can never escape being pictures of actors.

What gives Cameron’s pictures of actors their special quality—their status as treasures of photography of an unfathomably peculiar sort—is their singular combination of amateurism and artistry. In The Passing of Arthur, for example, the mast and oar of the makeshift boat representing a royal barge are obviously broomsticks and the water is puts one in mind of good amateur theatricals one has seen, and recalls with shameless delight.

What this question is testing

Local Purpose

Your task

Identify why the author included the referenced detail at that point in the passage — its function, not its content.

Common trap

Answers that merely repeat or summarize the topic of the detail instead of describing the role it plays.

Winning move

Ask what job the detail does for the paragraph, then for the passage's broader point.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
14.

The discussion of suspension of disbelief in the second paragraph serves which one of

Answer choices

  1. Not the Main Conclusion9% picked this

    It is the main conclusion of the passage, for which the discussion of Cameron's fancy-subject pictures serves

    In all the Local Purpose questions ever, this might be the only answer choice that has ever dared to say, "The role is plays is Main Point!" It's pretty safe to guarantee that the role of something Local will never be the main point. This answer describes a Theme / Example style passage in which the first paragraph starts a broader discussion of suspension of disbelief and then Cameron is introduced later as an example to illustrate this. This passage, of course, is totally Cameron-centric. She is the main event; this discussion of suspension of disbelief is a tiny interlude that helps to accentuate a point about the experience of looking at her photos.

  2. Correct64% picked this

    It introduces a contrast the author uses in characterizing the peculiar nature of our response

    Why this is right

    We can sign off on all parts of this. introduces a contrast Sure, it's saying while we can suspend our disbelief with narrative paintings, we can't do so with narrative photos. We're always aware of the photograph's doubleness - of each figure's imaginary and real personas. used to characterize the peculiar nature of our response to Cameron "It is precisely the camera's realism that has given Cameron's theatricality and artificiality its atmosphere of truth. It is is the truth of the sitting, rather than the fiction [people dressed up in order to depict], that wafts out of these wonderful and strange , not quite-in-focus photographs". Cameron's photos are captivating because of how funny it is to think about the real people posing for these pictures, and we can't help but notice the real people because of the camera's stubborn obsession with realism, its power to override our suspension of disbelief.

    Skill tested: Local Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Too Strong5% picked this

    It is the key step in an argument supporting the author's negative appraisal of the

    Too Strong: the key Out of Scope: negative appraisal Five words out of the gate, this answer is sounding corny. In order to call anything the key step in an argument, the author would have to announce it with some emphasis like "most importantly / most critically". If we read any further, we'll see it's accusing the author of having a negative opinion overall on the field of narrative photography. The author isn't being negative. She isn't saying an artistic project is crap if it doesn't allow you to suspend disbelief. She's just pointing out a distinction between two things. If we pointed out that, "A flat painting you can potentially see all at once, whereas a sculpture has to be seen in time as you move around it", we're not elevating or disparaging either art form.

  4. Out of Scope: criticism6% picked this

    It is used to explain a criticism of Cameron's fancy-subject pictures that the author shows

    There aren't any criticisms of Cameron discussed in the passage, so this couldn't possibly be part of an argument to show such a criticism is confused. All the evaluative thoughts in the passage belong to the author.

  5. Unsupported Comparison Detail-Sentence Bait16% picked this

    It draws a contrast between narrative painting and drama to support the author's conclusion that Cameron's fancy-subject pictures

    The author never implies that Cameron's photos are more like narrative painting than like drama. Drama is like narrative painting sometimes, in that the viewer can suspend disbelief. But drama is like narrative photos sometimes, in that the viewer cannot suspend disbelief. (Drama is sometimes yes, sometimes no, when it comes to suspension of disbelief). This answer is laying the classic trap on Local Purpose questions of baiting us into considering it by using wording from the actual Detail Sentence itself. If students were to go looking for the sentence that says "suspension of disbelief", they would see the words narrative painting right next to it. That's a cheap, superficial reason to like this answer (i.e. more likely to be a trap answer). Real answers make you work for it, via synonyms / restatements / deeper comprehension.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free