Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT140 S4 P3 Q14 Explanation

The Origins of Superior Performance

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsMain PointSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

In certain fields of human endeavor, such as music, chess, and some athletic activities, the performance of the best practitioners is so outstanding, so superior even to the performance of other highly experienced individuals in the field, that some people believe some notion of innate talent must be invoked to account for exceptional athletic performance, including superior motor coordination, speed of reflexes, and hand-eye coordination, can be inborn.

Until recently, however, little systematic research was done on the topic of superior performance, and previous estimates of the heritability of traits relevant to performance were based almost exclusively on random samples of the general population rather than on studies of highly trained superior performers as compared with the general population. Recent memory for configurations of chess pieces, but only if those configurations are typical of chess games.

The vast majority of exceptional adult performers were not exceptional as children, but started instruction early and improved their performance through sustained high-level training. Only extremely rarely is outstanding performance achieved without at least ten years of intensive, deliberate practice. With such intensive training, chess players who may not have superior innate capacity and the percentage of muscle fibers, show specific changes that develop from extended intense training.

The evidence does not, therefore, support the claim that a notion of innate talent must be invoked in order to account for the difference between good and outstanding performance, since it suggests instead that extended intense training, together with that level of talent common to all reasonably competent performers, may suffice to motivational factors are more likely to be effective predictors of superior performance than is innate talent.

What this question is testing

Main Point

Your task

Capture the passage's overall primary point — the claim everything else supports.

Common trap

Answers that are true but too narrow (a single paragraph) or too broad (beyond the passage's scope).

Winning move

Summarize the whole passage in one sentence first, then match it to a choice.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
14.

Which one of the following most accurately states the main point of

Answer choices

  1. Wrong Emphasis: lacks central topic3% picked this

    Researchers have recently found that many inborn traits, including a surprising number of physical characteristics and motivational factors, can be

    The main clause here says Researchers have found that many inborn traits can be altered through training and practice. Yes, that's true, but this passage is all about "superior performance". You forgot to mention the main character!

  2. Too Strong: anyone12% picked this

    Recent research into the origins of superior performance gives evidence that in sports, music, and some other fields of activity, anyone can achieve exceptional

    This is pretty close, "Research into superior performance says that anyone can achieve exceptional levels." We're looking for, "Research into superior performance says that innate talent is not required." The author didn't say that every single person can be Lebron James or Albert Einstein. She said that "extended intense training, together with that level of talent common to all reasonably competent performers, may suffice". If you are reasonably competent, and then you put in the ten years of intense sustained practice, then you can be a virtuoso in your field. But there's still some minimum requirements. Not everyone can do it.

  3. Too Strong: irrelevant Unsupported: previously accepted5% picked this

    Contrary to previously accepted theories of the development of expertise, researchers have now shown that innate characteristics are irrelevant to the differences in performance

    This is pretty close: "New research into expertise says that innate talent is irrelevant to reaching superstar status." We're looking for, "New research into expertise says that innate talent is not required for reaching superstar status." Also, this claims that the position in the first paragraph was a "previously accepted theory". The position in the first paragraph is just "certain psychologists".

  4. Correct74% picked this

    Recent research involving superior performers in various fields indicates that outstanding performance may result from adaptations due to training

    Why this is right

    The main clause of this sentence is that "new research in superior performance says that people become superstars through training rather than because of innate traits." That aligns with our Most Valuable Sentence, at the beginning of the final paragraph. The part about "various fields" is supported by the 2nd sentence of the 2nd paragraph: "Recent research in different domains of excellence suggests that exceptional performance arises predominantly from acquired complex skills and physiological adaptations, rather than from innate abilities". This answer choice matches up best with that line from the passage, which was essentially the sentence distilling the takeaway from the new research.

    Skill tested: Main Point · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Unsupported: revised their theories6% picked this

    Psychologists who previously attributed early childhood proficiency in such activities as music and chess to innate talent have revised their theories in light of

    We start with certain psychologists in the 1st paragraph, as a point of view the author is going to challenge. The rest of the passage consists of the author showing how new research challenges the position of those psychologists. We never hear about these psychologists going, "You're right, author. We're revising our theories. Thanks for showing us the truth". This answer is saying that the passage told us a story in which psychologists changed their beliefs.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free