Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT139 S3 P4 Q26 Explanation

Calvaria Major and the Dodo

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsAuthor OpinionScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Calvaria major is a rare but once-abundant tree found on the island of Mauritius, which was also home to the dodo, a large flightless bird that became extinct about three centuries ago. In 1977 Stanley Temple, an ecologist whose investigation of Calvaria major was a sidelight to his research on endangered birds fertile but that Temple assumed could no longer germinate, given his failure to find younger trees.

The temporal coincidence between the extinction of the dodo and what Temple considered the last evidence of natural germination of Calvaria major seeds led him to posit a causal connection. Specifically, he hypothesized that the fruit of Calvaria major had developed its extremely thick-walled pit as an evolutionary response to the dodo’s once been adaptive, Temple maintained, became a lethal imprisonment for the seeds after the dodo vanished.

Although direct proof was unattainable, Temple did offer some additional findings in support of his hypothesis, which lent his argument a semblance of rigor. From studies of other birds, he estimated the abrasive force generated within a dodo’s gizzard. Based on this estimate and on test results determining the crush-resistant strength of abraded yet intact. Three of these sprouted when planted, which he saw as vindicating his hypothesis.

Though many scientists found this dramatic and intriguing hypothesis plausible, Temple’s proposals have been strongly challenged by leading specialists in the field. Where Temple had found only thirteen specimens of Calvaria major, Wendy Strahm, the foremost expert on the plant ecology of Mauritius, has identified hundreds, many far younger than three centuries. disease and damage done by certain nonindigenous animals introduced onto Mauritius in the past few centuries.

What this question is testing

Author Opinion

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
26.

It can be most logically inferred from the passage that the author regards Temple’s hypothesis that the extinction of the dodo was the cause of Calvaria major’s seeming

Answer choices

  1. Opposite6% picked this

    essentially correct, but containing some inaccurate

    The author is closer to thinking that Temple is essentially incorrect. In the last paragraph, we hear that Calvaria major seeds have continued to germinate since the dodo's demise and that enough of its seeds can germinate, even if unabraded, that the tree will probably not go extinct.

  2. Reversed, if anything7% picked this

    initially implausible, but vindicated by his

    The author would probably say that Temple's hypothesis is "initially plausible, but ultimately invalidated by empirical findings".

  3. Opposite7% picked this

    an example of a valuable scientific achievement outside a researcher's primary

    Our author wouldn't call Temple's probably-wrong hypothesis a "valuable achievement".

  4. Too Strong: precise formulation9% picked this

    laudable for its precise formulation and its attention to

    The author gave a half-hearted compliment that Temple's supporting ideas "lent a semblance of rigor". That's saying, "it gave the impression it was rigorous (even though it wasn't)." Meanwhile, this answer is saying Temple's hypothesis should be praised for its precise formulation and detail, which makes it sound like the author thought the hypothesis was genuinely rigorous.

  5. Correct71% picked this

    an attempt to explain a state of affairs that did not

    Why this is right

    Temple was trying to explain why Calvaria major can no longer germinate, which this question stem even alludes to as "its seeming loss of ability to reproduce". But in the last paragraph, specialists discover that Calvaria has actually still been germinating even after the Dodo's demise, so Temple was ultimately trying to explain something that wasn't even true (he thought Calvaria could no longer germinate, but they can).

    Skill tested: Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free