Reading Comprehension

PT139 · S3 · P4 · Q23 Calvaria Major and the Dodo

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Calvaria major is a rare but once-abundant tree found on the island of Mauritius, which was also home to the dodo, a large flightless bird that became extinct about three centuries ago.

Topic

The decline of the Calvaria major tree on Mauritius and the debated link to the extinction of the dodo bird.

Framework

Challenge Position

Main Point

Stanley Temple proposed that the near-extinction of the Calvaria major tree was caused by the disappearance of the dodo, which he claimed was necessary for the tree’s seed germination; however, specialists have since challenged Temple’s theory, arguing that the tree can reproduce without the dodo and that other causes may better explain its rarity. (Most Valuable Sentence: The final paragraph, especially: )

P1: Introduction to Calvaria Major and Temple’s Hypothesis

We learn that Calvaria major used to be common on Mauritius, which was also home to the now-extinct dodo. Stanley Temple noted only old, dying Calvaria trees remaining and speculated that the trees stopped reproducing after the dodo disappeared.

P2: Explaining Temple’s Dodo Hypothesis

Temple suggested that the Calvaria fruit evolved a tough pit because the dodo ate the fruit, and that the dodo's process of eating and digesting the fruit was necessary to break down the pit so seeds could germinate. Without dodos, he thought, seeds were trapped and couldn’t grow.

P3: Temple’s Supporting Evidence

Temple did some indirect experiments, like feeding Calvaria pits to turkeys, and a few seeds sprouted. He used data from other birds and seed strength tests to argue that the dodo's gizzard could have done the job, using this as evidence for his theory.

23.

The author indicates that Temple's research on birds of the island of Mauritius

  1. Correct

    was largely concerned with species

    Why this is right

    This matches that 2nd sentence of the passage. Temple's investigation of the tree was a sidelight, meaning that his "main light" was research on endangered birds of Mauritius. "Endangered" = facing threat of extinction

    Skill tested: Locate Detail · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    55% picked this

  2. furnished him with the basis

    Out of Scope: highly accurate

    In the 3rd paragraph, it says that Temple "estimated the abrasive force generated within a dodo's gizzard. Based on this estimate and on test results determining the crush-resistant strength of C.m. pits ..." It doesn't say that these estimates were highly accurate. It also doesn't say that he conducted these tests. The sentence is ambiguous. It sounds like it could mean that he combined his estimate of abrasive force with already known test results about the crush-resistant strength.

    5% picked this

  3. provided experimental evidence that some

    Too Strong: roughly the same

    At the end of the 3rd paragraph, Temple is feeding some C.m. pits to modern turkeys, but nothing in that section uses any comparative language to indicate whether turkey gizzards exert roughly the same amount of abrasive force as did dodo gizzards.

    14% picked this

  4. was comprehensive in scope and

    Too Strong: methodological precision

    The first sentence of the 3rd paragraph is suggesting that Temple's argument had the semblance of rigor. "Semblance", from "resemblance", means "it looks like X but isn't really X". She has a strong resemblance to Hillary Clinton means she looks like Hillary but isn't actually Hillary. Similarly, saying his arguments had the semblance of rigor is saying that from afar his arguments looked like they had rigor, but they did not really have rigor. Saying his research was "comprehensive and precise" is too complimentary, given that this whole passage is about showing that Temple's theory was initially popular but has pretty much been debunked.

    1% picked this

  5. was originally inspired by his

    Out of Scope: originally inspired

    The passage never identifies what originally inspired Temple's work on the island, but given that the 2nd sentence tells us that his research was mainly on endangered birds, that would be our best guess as to his original inspiration for coming to do research on the island.

    24% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free