Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Easy

PT139 S3 P1 Q2 Explanation

Improving Farm Economics

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsNon-Author OpinionSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

The prevailing trend in agriculture toward massive and highly mechanized production, with its heavy dependence on debt and credit as a means of raising capital, has been linked to the growing problem of bankruptcy among small farms. African American horticulturalist Booker T. Whatley has proposed a comprehensive approach to small farming that believes will bring about such profitability when combined with smart management and hard work.

Whatley emphasizes that small farms must generate year-round cash flow. To this end, he recommends growing at least ten different crops, which would alleviate financial problems should one crop fail completely. To minimize the need to seek hard-to-obtain loans, the market for the farm products should be developed via a “clientele membership crops that clients ask for, and to comply with client requests regarding the use of chemicals.

Whatley stresses that this “pick-your-own” farming is crucial for profitability because 50 percent of a farmer’s production cost is tied up with harvesting, and using clients as harvesters allows the farmer to charge 60 percent of what supermarkets charge and still operate the farm at a profit. Whatley’s plan also affords farmers needed. The CMC would consist primarily of people from metropolitan areas who value fresh produce.

The success of this plan, Whatley cautions, depends in large part on a farm’s location: the farm should be situated on a hard-surfaced road within 40 miles of a population center of at least 50,000 people, as studies suggest that people are less inclined to travel any greater distances for food. In alternative to sprawling corporate farms while providing top-quality agricultural goods to consumers in most urban areas.

What this question is testing

Non-Author Opinion

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
2.

Based on the information in the passage, which one of the following would Whatley be most likely to view as facilitating adherence to an aspect of his plan

Answer choices

  1. Out of Scope1% picked this

    a farmer's planting a relatively unknown crop to test the market

    Out of Scope: testing unknown crops Opposite, if anything This seems almost contradicted by the idea at the end of the 2nd paragraph, where Whatley is suggesting that farmers "grow only crops that clients ask for". This answer is saying, "Nah -- farmers should experiment with relatively unknown crops and just see how it goes. Test to see if there ends up being demand for it, once it's grown."

  2. Correct85% picked this

    a farmer's leaving large lanes between plots of each crop to allow people easy access

    Why this is right

    This can align with the first sentence of the 3rd paragraph: Whatley stresses that this "pick-your-own" farming is crucial for profitability because ... using clients as harvesters allows the farmer to charge 60% of what supermarkets charge and still operate the farm at a profit". The passage certainly never mentioned "wide lanes" in between plots of crops, but this is the sort of squishy, Most Supported task where we're allowed to apply our common sense to stuff that was talked about in the passage. Since it's crucial that clients harvest their own crops, leaving large lanes that allow people easy access at harvest time would facilitate that part of the plan.

    Skill tested: Non-Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Out of Scope6% picked this

    a farmer's traveling into the city two afternoons a week to sell fresh produce at

    Out of Scope: traveling to city Opposite, if anything The final paragraph is stressing that the customers come to the farm, not vice versa. Whatley "reverses the traditional view of roads as farm-to-market roads, calling them instead city-to-farm roads".

  4. Out of Scope: honor system3% picked this

    a farmer's using an honor system whereby produce is displayed on tables in view of the road and passersby can buy produce and

    This goes against the 3rd paragraph's description. These farming collectives aren't selling to random passersby who leave some money in a box. They're selling to clients who pay in advance and who come and harvest their own produce. The idea of having already-harvested produce to sell to random passersby goes against two signature parts of the plan.

  5. Unclear Impact4% picked this

    a farmer's deciding that for environmental reasons chemicals will no longer be used on the

    This one is pretty tempting, because it seems like it could facilitate adherence to the idea at the end of the 2nd paragraph that farms should "comply with client requests regarding the use of chemicals". If a farmer decided for environmental reasons that she would no longer use chemicals to increase farm yields, and her clients requested chemical-free crops, then it would seem like the first thing facilitated adherence to the second thing. But we don't know for sure that clients are requesting "No chemicals can be used on these crops!" If we were sure that all clients didn't want any chemicals, then we wouldn't hear it phrased as "comply with client requests regarding use of chemicals". We would just hear, "grow only crops that clients ask for and don't use any chemicals on them". The wording Whatley uses is deliberately dynamic and responsive to customer requests. Maybe there are customers who are not worried about chemicals and are more concerned with high yields and getting crops with minimal pest damage. In that case, a farmer who decides to get rid of chemicals for environmental reasons would not be adhering to Whatley's plan. The intended giveaway here was that the farmer was making a decision on chemicals for environmental reasons, when Whatley's plan involves making a decision on chemicals based on customer requests. So this is meant to sound like a mismatch for Whatley's plan. It's only because we probably surmise that most clients would ask for chemical-free crops that we would think this answer is sort of "arriving at the right place, even if for the wrong reason".

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free