Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT139 S2 P3 Q14 Explanation

The Birth of Chicano Theater

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsMeaning in ContextHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Most scholars of Mexican American history mark César Chávez’s unionizing efforts among Mexican and Mexican American farm laborers in California as the beginning of Chicano political activism in the 1960s. By 1965, Chávez’s United Farm Workers Union gained international recognition by initiating a worldwide boycott of grapes in an effort to get having initiated the Chicano theater movement, a movement that would reach its apex in the 1970s.

In the fall of 1965, Valdez gathered a group of striking farm workers and asked them to talk about their working conditions. A former farm worker himself, Valdez was no stranger to the players in the daily drama that was fieldwork. He asked people to illustrate what happened on the picket lines, audience to social action. Because actos were based on participants’ personal experiences, they had palpable immediacy.

In her book El Teatro Campesino, Yolanda Broyles-González rightly criticizes theater historians for having tended to credit Valdez individually with inventing actos as a genre, as if the striking farm workers’ improvisational talent had depended entirely on his vision and expertise for the form it took. She traces especially the actos’ connections in the European tradition of Valdez’s academic training, but a distinctive genre with connections to both.

What this question is testing

Meaning in Context

Topic

The author is telling the founding story of Chicano theater in the 1960s and giving credit where credit is due — including correcting an oversimplified version of the story.

Framework

Highlight Noteworthy.

Main Point

The simpler version: in 1965, the same year Chávez's farm-worker union got famous from the grape boycott, Luis Valdez approached him about using theater to organize farm workers. Valdez worked with striking farm workers, and they together created what they called "actos" — short, satirical sketches. People give Valdez sole credit for inventing this genre, but a scholar named Broyles-González says it's more accurate to call it a collective accomplishment. The workers had cultural roots in a similar earlier tradition called "carpas." Valdez's contribution was still crucial, but he wasn't the lone genius.

P1: Two 1965 events

Chávez's farm-worker union became internationally famous through the grape boycott. The same year, Valdez approached Chávez about using theater for organizing. The Teatro Campesino is credited with kicking off Chicano theater.

P2: How the actos got made

Valdez gathered striking workers and had them act out their picket-line experiences. He turned their improvisation into actos — short skits with a satirical edge that named a problem and pointed to a solution. Because they came from personal experience, they had real punch.

P3: A corrective

Some scholars credit Valdez personally with inventing the actos genre. The author, citing Broyles-González, says that's wrong. The actos drew on a real cultural tradition called carpas — informal satirical shows in tents that had been performed for working-class audiences along the Mexico-U.S. border. Many of the Teatro's farm-worker members probably had personal ties to carpas. So the actos were a collective creation, not a solo invention. Valdez's role was still crucial — he turned the raw material into a distinctive new genre.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
14.

The author uses the word “immediacy” (end of second paragraph) most likely in

Answer choices

  1. Out of Scope1% picked this

    how little physical distance there was between the performers in the late 1960s actos

    This is doing the Dictionary Trap of writing an answer choice that sounds like physical immediacy. But we're talking about the performances of the actors, not their proximity. We can measure each of these answers by thinking, would it make sense to say that, "because these skits were based on the actors personal experiences, there was very little physical distance between performers and audience?"

  2. Out of Scope9% picked this

    the sense of intimacy created by the performers' technique of addressing many of their lines

    Performers addressing their lines directly to the audience is not discussed in the passage. We can measure each of these answers by thinking, would it make sense to say that, "because these skits were based on personal experience, the actors addressed their lines directly to the audience?"

  3. Out of Scope24% picked this

    the ease with which the Teatro Campesino members were able to develop actos based on

    The difficulty of developing actos is not discussed in the passage. We can measure each of these answers by thinking, would it make sense to say that, "because these skits were based on personal experience, these skits had [little trouble in being developed by the performers]?" The adjective "immediacy" is meant to describe the performance of the skit itself. This answer is describing the process of developing the skit, so it doesn't fit naturally into a sentence about what effect the skits have on an audience.

  4. Out of Scope1% picked this

    how closely the director and performers of the Teatro Campesino worked together to build a

    Directors of actos are not discussed in the passage. This is playing off the same definition of "immediacy" as meaning physically close that choice (A) was. "Immediacy" is describing the aesthetic properties of the skits. Because they were drawn from personal experience, these skits had the property of "having been worked on closely by the director and the performers"?

  5. Correct65% picked this

    how vividly the actos conveyed the performers' experiences to

    Why this is right

    This is pretty close to our predictions. If you based a sketch on a personal experience then the sketch will probably have qualities such as ... - realistic acting - believable / relatable circumstances This answer reinforces the idea that people are usually able to act very convincingly (and thus vividly and compellingly) when they're drawing upon actual previous emotions. Overall, "very vividly conveyed" has a somewhat loose connection to "based on personal experience", but it's still a stronger connection than any of these other answers, many of which described the backstory behind these skits, whereas the adjective 'immediacy' is describing the aesthetic properties of the skits themselves, as they're being performed or consumed.

    Skill tested: Meaning in Context · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free