Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT138 S4 Q17 Explanation

Humankind would not have survived

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsParallel

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Humankind would not have survived, as it clearly has, if our ancestors had not been motivated by the desire to sacrifice themselves when doing so would ensure the survival of their children or other close relatives. But since even this kind of follows that our ancestors were at least partially altruistic.

What this question is testing

Parallel

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
17.

Which one of the following arguments is most similar in its reasoning to

Answer choices

  1. Correct63% picked this

    Students do not raise their grades if they do not increase the amount of time they spend studying. Increased study time requires good time

    Why this is right

    Raise grades ? More study time More study time ? Good time Raise grades. management ???????????????????????????????? Good time management

    Skill tested: Parallel · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Bad Premise Match Bad Conclusion Match11% picked this

    Organisms are capable of manufacturing their own carbohydrate supply if they do not consume other organisms to obtain it. So plants that consume insects

    We only have 2 premises (original had 3), so that's a quick way to get rid of this. We don't have two conditional premises; we have one conditional and one MOST claim. The conclusion also brings in a brand new idea (bug-eating insects). carbs from others ? make own most plants ? carbs from bugs ????????????????????????????????????? Bug-eating plants ? Photosynthesis

  3. Bad Premise Match Bad Conclusion Match5% picked this

    If fragile ecosystems are not protected by government action their endemic species will perish, for endemic species are by definition those that exist

    We only have 1 premise (original had 3), so that's a quick way to get rid of this. We don't have two conditional premises; we have one conditional. The conclusion is a conditional (the original was not). endemic species ? only lives in one eco ???????????????????????????????????? government protected ecosystems ? endemic species die

  4. Bad Premise Match15% picked this

    The natural resources used by human beings will be depleted if they are not replaced by alternative materials. But since such replacement generally requires

    We only have 2 premises (original had 3). We don't have two conditional premises; we have one conditional and one "probable" claim. natural resources depleted ? replace natural resources with alterative replace natural resources with alternative ? generally requires more power ?????????????????????????????????????????? more power ? depleted

  5. Weak Premise Match5% picked this

    Public buildings do not harmonize with their surroundings if they are not well designed. But any well-designed building is expensive to construct. Thus, either

    We only have 2 premises (original had 3). We have two conditional premises that chain together, but we also need a factual premise that triggers a factual conclusion. This conclusion is either / or. Public buildings harmonize with surroundings ? well designed well designed ? expensive to construct ??????????????????????????? Public buildings ? expensive or harmonizing

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free