Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT138 S4 Q13 Explanation

Many economists claim that financial rewards provide

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsWeaken

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Many economists claim that financial rewards provide the strongest incentive for people to choose one job over another. But in many surveys, most people do not name high salary as the most desirable feature of a job. This shows that these are motivated by money in their job choices.

What this question is testing

Weaken

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion less likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that look negative but attack a claim the argument never relied on.

Winning move

Find the assumption the argument depends on, then pick the choice that undermines it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
13.

Which one of the following, if true, most weakens

Answer choices

  1. So Weak3% picked this

    Even high wages do not enable people to obtain all the

    Even X doesn't let me get every single thing I desire. Big whoop. None of us think that there's something out there that would let us get every single good we desire, so there's it's not changing anyone's mind about X. Also, this basically goes the opposite direction of what we're trying to do: argue that financial rewards are the #1 thing that people care about when choosing a job.

  2. Irrelevant50% picked this

    In many surveys, people say that they would prefer a high-wage job to an otherwise identical

    This establishes that people have a positive attitude towards higher salaries: they'd rather have it than not have it. But the argument isn't about whether you'd rather have a higher salary than not have it. It's about comparing the relative importance of salary to things like coworkers, flexible schedule, a boss you respect, vacation and parental leave policies, etc. This answer doesn't address that conversation at all because it's comparing two otherwise identical jobs. The only thing different is higher salary, so of course we'd take the higher salary. There are no trade-offs. Say that in selecting a law school, the most important thing to you was school ranking. Financial aid mattered, but not as much. It would be true to say that "you'd prefer to get lots of financial aid at school X than you would to get a lower amount of financial aid at school X." That doesn't mean financial aid is your #1 concern. It just says you'd rather have it than not have it, all other things being equal.

  3. Correct43% picked this

    Jobs that pay the same salary often vary considerably in their

    Why this is right

    This speaks to the term shift between the surveys about "salary" and the conclusion about "financial rewards". It allows us to argue, "The economists are right that financial rewards are the #1 thing people care about when choosing a job. True, salary is not #1, but the overall compensation package, including health benefits, paid leave, stock options, and salary are the #1 thing people care about."

    Skill tested: Weaken · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Too Weak2% picked this

    Many people enjoy the challenge of a difficult job, as long as they feel that

    This isn't comparative at all, and this whole argument is about comparing the relative importance of things. We don't care that people enjoy challenging work. We care about whether they value challenging work more / less than they value financial rewards. Also "many" is a very weak quantity that essentially means "at least 5 or 10", so this isn't telling us much about people broadly.

  5. Too Weak / Irrelevant1% picked this

    Some people are not aware that jobs with high salaries typically leave very little

    This, like (D), is weak and non-comparative. It says "at least one person doesn't know that high-paying jobs usually don't leave you with as much disposable time". There's no way that learning about this one dude will help us argue that "financial rewards generally ARE the #1 thing people care about".

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free