Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT138 S3 Q6 Explanation

Medical columnist: Some doctors

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsParadox

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Medical columnist: Some doctors recommend taking vitamin C to help maintain overall health because vitamin C is an antioxidant, a substance that protects the body from certain types of oxygen particles that can trigger disease. People suffering from various ailments are encouraged to take vitamin C to guard against developing other health undergoing therapies with side effects that are detrimental to their overall health.

What this question is testing

Paradox

Paradox

The puzzle: vitamin C is normally recommended — it's an antioxidant, it protects against disease. People who are already sick are especially told to take it. But cancer patients in treatment? Doctors say no, even though the treatment itself is wrecking their health.

Evaluate

So what's special about cancer patients? They're sick, undergoing harsh therapy — by the general logic, they should be the most in need of vitamin C's protective effects. Something must be unique about their situation that flips the recommendation.

The likely candidate: vitamin C interacts badly with cancer therapy. If it interferes with how the therapy works, taking vitamin C would actually undermine the treatment itself — which would be much worse than missing out on its general benefits.

Goal

Find the answer that gives a specific reason vitamin C is bad for someone in cancer treatment.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
6.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to explain why the doctors' recommendation to some cancer patients differs from the general

Answer choices

  1. Correct97% picked this

    Some kinds of cancer cells absorb large amounts of vitamin C, which interferes with the oxidation mechanism by which many

    Why this is right

    This resolves the paradox cleanly. Cancer cells absorb large amounts of vitamin C, and that absorption interferes with the oxidation mechanism many cancer therapies use to kill cancer cells. So for cancer patients undergoing therapy, vitamin C actively undermines the treatment — it protects the cancer cells from the very mechanism that's supposed to kill them. That's a unique downside that doesn't apply to people taking vitamin C for general health, and it explains why doctors flip their recommendation specifically for this group.

    Skill tested: Paradox · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. No Impact1% picked this

    Vitamin C has not been shown to reduce people's risk of developing cancer, even at the very high dosage

    This says vitamin C hasn't been shown to prevent cancer. But doctors are discouraging it from people who already have cancer — preventive efficacy is a separate question. Whether vitamin C prevents cancer or not doesn't explain why doctors actively discourage cancer patients in treatment from taking it.

  3. No Impact1% picked this

    Cancer cells that are susceptible to certain types of cancer therapies are not likely to be affected by

    This says cancer cells susceptible to certain therapies aren't affected by vitamin C. If vitamin C neither helps nor hurts the cancer cells, then it's neutral with respect to therapy — which would not explain why doctors actively discourage patients from taking it. We need a reason vitamin C is bad for cancer patients in therapy, and this gives a reason it's not bad.

  4. Cheats Paradox0% picked this

    The better the overall health of cancer patients while undergoing therapy, the more likely they are to

    This deepens the puzzle rather than resolving it. If patients with better overall health during therapy are more likely to recover, then anything that improves overall health (like vitamin C, an antioxidant) should be encouraged. This makes the doctors' recommendation against vitamin C even more puzzling, not less.

  5. No Impact1% picked this

    Certain side effects of cancer therapies that are detrimental to patients' overall health are not

    This tells us vitamin C doesn't help with certain side effects. If vitamin C is just unhelpful in this specific way, doctors might be neutral about it — but they're actively discouraging it. We need a reason vitamin C is harmful, not just unhelpful. Failing to address some side effects doesn't explain why patients are warned away from taking it.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free