Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT138 S3 Q10 Explanation

Fishery officials are still

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMost Supported

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Fishery officials are still considering options for eliminating Lake Davis's population of razor-toothed northern pike, a fierce game fish that could threaten salmon and trout populations if it slips into the adjoining river system. Introducing pike-specific diseases and draining the lake have been ruled out. Four years ago, poison was added to the water remained tainted for months and the region's tourism economy suffered.

What this question is testing

Most Supported

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
10.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the

Answer choices

  1. Unsupported1% picked this

    Draining the lake would not cause the region's tourism economy

    All we know about drained lake is "ruled out". Maybe it would, maybe it wouldn't cause the tourism economy to suffer. Common sense probably suggests that if the tainted water hurt tourism four years ago, the tourists must be kinda interested in coming to use the water. So a drained lake likely would hurt tourism.

  2. Too Strong: the only3% picked this

    Four years ago was the only time that poison was used against the pike

    This is the ol' Only One Mentioned = Only One trap. Just because we only talked about poisoning the lake four years ago, that doesn't mean four years ago is the only time we poisoned the lake. (I don't mean to brag, but .... we've poisoned that lake a ton!)

  3. Correct80% picked this

    The poison added to the lake four years ago was not successful in ridding the

    Why this is right

    Given that the problem of "how do we get the pike out of this lake, before they escape into the river system" still exists, we can assume that the poison didn't do the job in eradicating the pike. If we were thinking, "maybe the poison rid the lake of the pike 4 years ago, but then 2 years ago the pike was reintroduced." Sure. You're right. That's possible. But it's not probable. It's pretty rare for a fish species to completely vanish from an ecosystem, but then come back at a problematic level just a couple years later. And check the question stem: it's Most Supported, so it doesn't have to be perfect. This synthesizes ideas (the way correct answers are supposed to) by combining "we're still mulling over solutions" with "4 years ago, we tried poison".

    Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Too Strong: none other than X2% picked this

    Four years ago, fishery officials did not consider any options other

    This is the ol' Only One Mentioned = Only One trap Poison was the only solution mentioned from 4 years ago, but that doesn't mean that the only solution tried 4 years ago was poison.

  5. Too Strong: essential13% picked this

    Salmon and trout populations in the Lake Davis area are essential to

    We can infer that salmon and trout populations have some value, since we are mulling over solutions in an attempt to save them. But we don't have any evidence that they're essential to the local economy.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free